From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Dong Yibo <dong100@mucse.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yaojun@mucse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 1/4] net: rnpgbe: Add interrupt handling
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 10:34:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805093428.GN51943@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731120322.895955-2-dong100@mucse.com>
On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 08:03:19PM +0800, Dong Yibo wrote:
...
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_main.c
...
> @@ -50,6 +68,11 @@ static int rnpgbe_open(struct net_device *netdev)
> **/
> static int rnpgbe_close(struct net_device *netdev)
> {
> + struct mucse *mucse = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +
> + rnpgbe_down(mucse);
> + rnpgbe_free_irq(mucse);
> +
> return 0;
> }
Hi Dong,
There is an AI-generated review of this patch-set available at
https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260731120322.895955-1-dong100%40mucse.com
I would appreciate it if you could take a look over it.
In particular, the following issue does seem to be of concern.
I take the last portion regarding ixgbe to be a template for a solution to
the problem raised, not that the __IXGBE_DOWN bit should litteraly be used
in the rnpgbe driver.
Is ndo_stop now safe to call twice?
rnpgbe_dev_shutdown() in this same file calls rnpgbe_close() directly rather
than going through dev_close():
rtnl_lock();
netif_device_detach(netdev);
if (netif_running(netdev))
rnpgbe_close(netdev);
rtnl_unlock();
netif_device_detach() only clears __LINK_STATE_PRESENT, so IFF_UP and
__LINK_STATE_START stay set and the core still believes the interface is up.
A later dev_close() (device_shutdown() runs before migrate_to_reboot_cpu(),
so an "ip link set dev X down" on another CPU can still get through), or an
unbind/unregister_netdev() after a shutdown, would call ndo_stop again:
dev_close() -> __dev_close_many() -> ops->ndo_stop() -> rnpgbe_close()
On that second pass rnpgbe_down() runs again:
void rnpgbe_down(struct mucse *mucse)
{
set_bit(__MUCSE_DOWN, &mucse->state);
rnpgbe_napi_disable_all(mucse);
rnpgbe_irq_disable(mucse);
}
With plain set_bit() there is nothing to detect the re-entry, so
napi_disable() runs on an already-disabled NAPI. In napi_disable_locked():
while (val & (NAPIF_STATE_SCHED | NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC)) {
usleep_range(20, 200);
val = READ_ONCE(n->state);
}
The irq is already freed and NAPI was never re-enabled, so can anything
clear those bits? That loop has no timeout, and it runs under rtnl_lock().
The second rnpgbe_free_irq() would also call free_irq() on vectors already
released, giving the "Trying to free already-free IRQ" warning.
Before this patch rnpgbe_close() was just "return 0;", so the double call
was harmless.
Would the ixgbe guard fit here?
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c:ixgbe_down() {
/* signal that we are down to the interrupt handler */
if (test_and_set_bit(__IXGBE_DOWN, &adapter->state))
return; /* do nothing if already down */
...
}
Alternatively, should rnpgbe_dev_shutdown() call dev_close() so the core
state stays consistent?
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 12:03 [PATCH net-next v8 0/4] net: rnpgbe: Add TX/RX and link status support Dong Yibo
2026-07-31 12:03 ` [PATCH net-next v8 1/4] net: rnpgbe: Add interrupt handling Dong Yibo
2026-08-05 9:34 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-08-05 11:04 ` Yibo Dong
2026-07-31 12:03 ` [PATCH net-next v8 2/4] net: rnpgbe: Add basic TX packet transmission support Dong Yibo
2026-07-31 12:03 ` [PATCH net-next v8 3/4] net: rnpgbe: Add RX packet reception support Dong Yibo
2026-07-31 12:03 ` [PATCH net-next v8 4/4] net: rnpgbe: Add link status handling support Dong Yibo
2026-08-05 9:39 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805093428.GN51943@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dong100@mucse.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=yaojun@mucse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®