From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Yichong Chen <chenyichong@uniontech.com>
Cc: dakr@kernel.org, djakov@kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com,
rafael@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs: serialize debugfs_create_str() writers
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 10:00:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026080522-viper-movie-1c35@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804055056.877823-1-chenyichong@uniontech.com>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 01:50:56PM +0800, Yichong Chen wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I tried the direction you suggested and converted the SoundWire
> firmware_file debugfs entry away from debugfs_create_str().
>
> The draft diff below does two things:
>
> 1. debugfs_create_str() becomes read-only only. It drops write
> permission bits from the requested mode. If the caller passed only
> write bits, it creates an owner-readable file instead of a 0000 file.
If the caller passes write bits, the function should fail to create the
file at all, to make it easy to determine what just went wrong :)
> 2. drivers/soundwire/debugfs.c uses debugfs_create_file() with a small
> local write-only file operation for firmware_file.
Great!
> The SoundWire command path copies firmware_file under a mutex before using
> it for request_firmware(), so a later debugfs write can replace the global
> string without invalidating the name being used by the command.
As this is debugging only, and root only, and loading firmware files
which better only be done by a developer on their own, this should be
fine and not really an issue at all (i.e. if it breaks, they get to keep
the pieces of their broken system...)
> I tested the generic debugfs_create_str() mode handling with a small test
> module:
>
> 0444 -> 0444, readable, write fails
> 0600 -> 0400, readable, write fails
> 0200 -> 0400, readable, write fails
>
> I do not have SoundWire hardware in my test VM, so I could only build that
> part.
>
> Does this match the direction you had in mind? If so, I can finish the
> conversion for the interconnect writable string users as well and send a
> proper v2.
Sure, but it should be a patch series, first convert the existing write
string usages to local copies, and then change the debugfs code to
refuse to handle writing strings.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 6:09 Yichong Chen
2026-08-03 6:19 ` Greg KH
2026-08-03 8:34 ` Yichong Chen
2026-08-03 8:43 ` Greg KH
2026-08-04 5:50 ` Yichong Chen
2026-08-05 8:00 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026080522-viper-movie-1c35@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chenyichong@uniontech.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=djakov@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®