mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,  Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Danielle Costantino <dcostantino@meta.com>,
	 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>, Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>,
	 Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
	 "Liam R . Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 0/2] mm/slab: fix unbounded recursion in free path with memalloc profiling
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 05:37:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806-kmalloc-no-objext-for-6-12-y-v1-0-036dfc3273fc@kernel.org> (raw)

This is backport of "mm/slab: fix unbounded recursion in free path with
memalloc profiling" series [1] for 6.12.y.

The patch 1 was adjusted for 6.12 as mem_profiling_support is marked
__init in 6.12. I simply resolved this by marking
mem_alloc_profiling_permanently_disabled() __init since in 6.12 we need
it only when creating kmalloc-no-objext-* caches during the boot
process.

Patch 2 has slight functional differences compared to mainline
due to lack of SLAB_ALLOC_* flags, sheaves, and kmalloc_nolock().
I described those subtlties in the backporting notes in detail.

The first two patches from the original patchset [1] are not backported
to 6.12.y as they are no-op in 6.12.y:

 - mm/slab: fix a memory leak due to bootstrapping sheaves twice
 - mm/slab: decouple SLAB_NO_SHEAVES from SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260713-kmalloc-no-objext-v3-0-47c7bd138de7@kernel.org

To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Danielle Costantino <dcostantino@meta.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
To: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
To: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
To: "Liam R . Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
---
Harry Yoo (Oracle) (2):
      lib/alloc_tag: introduce mem_alloc_profiling_permanently_disabled()
      mm/slab: prevent unbounded recursion in free path with new kmalloc type

 include/linux/alloc_tag.h |  3 +++
 include/linux/slab.h      |  8 +++++++-
 lib/alloc_tag.c           |  9 +++++++++
 mm/slab.h                 | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 mm/slab_common.c          | 13 +++++++++++++
 mm/slub.c                 | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 6 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 833291ee77846538926c990bcb468f6f54e9af50
change-id: 20260804-kmalloc-no-objext-for-6-12-y-bedd8e852aeb

Best regards,
-- 
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon


             reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06  5:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06  5:37 Harry Yoo (Oracle) [this message]
2026-08-06  5:37 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/2] lib/alloc_tag: introduce mem_alloc_profiling_permanently_disabled() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-08-06  5:37 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/2] mm/slab: prevent unbounded recursion in free path with new kmalloc type Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-08-06 17:49 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 0/2] mm/slab: fix unbounded recursion in free path with memalloc profiling Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260806-kmalloc-no-objext-for-6-12-y-v1-0-036dfc3273fc@kernel.org \
    --to=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=dcostantino@meta.com \
    --cc=hao.ge@linux.dev \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®