mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vishal Badole <Vishal.Badole@amd.com>
Cc: <tglx@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>,
	<wangyang.guo@intel.com>, <tianyou.li@intel.com>,
	<tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, <dan.liang@intel.com>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/group_cpus: Snapshot cluster masks to keep grouping hotplug invariant
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 13:38:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807133840.31a194a9cd04d4a2b6d817c1@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807073612.3711269-1-Vishal.Badole@amd.com>

On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 13:06:12 +0530 Vishal Badole <Vishal.Badole@amd.com> wrote:

> group_cpus_evenly() builds the managed-IRQ affinity spread used by
> multi-queue devices such as NVMe. That spread is meant to be a property
> of the static CPU topology: it walks cpu_present_mask and then
> cpu_possible_mask so every hardware queue owns a fixed set of CPUs,
> including CPUs that are offline at the time. A driver depends on that
> partition staying stable across re-computation - the CPUs a queue is
> given at probe must still describe the same queue after the device is
> later reset and its affinity recomputed.
> 
> On an AMD system that stability breaks across an s2idle cycle. With CPUs
> 3-11 offlined and only CPUs 0-2 left online, the machine is suspended to
> s2idle and resumed. The NVMe controller uses the simple-suspend quirk, so
> resume fully re-initialises it and recomputes the affinity spread. The
> system then hangs for roughly two minutes and stays sluggish afterwards,
> the controller only making progress through its command-timeout poll:
> 
>   nvme nvme0: I/O tag 898 (3382) QID 9 timeout, completion polled
>   nvme nvme0: I/O tag 398 (618e) QID 11 timeout, completion polled
> 
> QID 9 and QID 11 are the queues whose CPUs were offline when the spread
> was recomputed. "completion polled" means the commands did finish in
> hardware, but their interrupts were never delivered to a CPU that was
> watching the queue, so nothing reaped them until the timeout fired.
> 
> It happens because commit 89802ca36c96 ("lib/group_cpus: make group CPU
> cluster aware") derives the cluster groups from topology_cluster_cpumask(),
> which lists only the cluster siblings that are online when it is called.
> The resulting partition therefore depends on the transient online mask
> rather than on the topology alone. Recomputed on resume while the non-boot
> CPUs are still offline, it no longer matches the boot-time partition, and a
> queue is left with an affinity that does not cover the CPU it is meant to
> serve once that CPU comes back online. The dependence is on the online
> mask, not on any AMD-specific behaviour, so the same stall is reproducible
> on Intel platforms as well.

Thanks for the careful description of what is wrong.  It helps.

And things do sounds very wrong.  Could people@intel please prioritize
their review and testing of this fix?

> Make the cluster grouping depend on the complete cluster topology rather
> than on whichever CPUs happen to be online. Snapshot the cluster masks
> once while every CPU is online and reuse that view for every later spread.
> A fully-online view is the complete cluster membership, so the partition
> derived from it is identical no matter which CPUs are online when the
> controller is reset, which is exactly the invariance the callers already
> assume.
> 
> ...
>
> +	/*
> +	 * Only a fully-online view is the complete cluster membership; if any

minor: the above sentence is hard to understand.

> +	if (!data_race(cpumask_equal(cpu_possible_mask, cpu_online_mask)))

AI review suggests using cpu_present_mask here:

	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807073612.3711269-1-Vishal.Badole@amd.com

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-07  7:36 Vishal Badole
2026-08-07 20:38 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-08-09 17:11   ` Badole, Vishal
2026-08-20  5:36   ` Guo, Wangyang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260807133840.31a194a9cd04d4a2b6d817c1@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Vishal.Badole@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tianyou.li@intel.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=wangyang.guo@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®