mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: paulmck@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 d@ilvokhin.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] locking/csd-lock: Pack csd_lock_wait_toolong() state into a struct
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 04:29:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810-csd-stall-duration-v2-1-795083bf04a4@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810-csd-stall-duration-v2-0-795083bf04a4@debian.org>

csd_lock_wait_toolong() has some fields and they are being expanded now,
separate them into a structure, that can be easily digestible.

This simplify the function aslo, given the fields were passed by
reference, and the ts0/ts1 names say nothing about what the two
timestamps hold.

Pack them into struct csd_wait_state and name the timestamps for what
they store, ts_start and ts_report.  The local ts2 becomes ts_now.

Reporting a further timestamp, such as next patch, then costs a struct
member rather than another argument.

No functional change.

Suggested-by: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
 kernel/smp.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 52dffc86555cd..e00b8f620c5d9 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -223,50 +223,58 @@ bool csd_lock_is_stuck(void)
 	return !!atomic_read(&n_csd_lock_stuck);
 }
 
+/* State that csd_lock_wait_toolong() carries across the __csd_lock_wait() loop. */
+struct csd_wait_state {
+	u64 ts_start;		/* When the wait began. */
+	u64 ts_report;		/* When the last complaint was printed. */
+	int bug_id;
+	unsigned long nmessages;
+};
+
 /*
  * Complain if too much time spent waiting.  Note that only
  * the CSD_TYPE_SYNC/ASYNC types provide the destination CPU,
  * so waiting on other types gets much less information.
  */
-static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, int *bug_id, unsigned long *nmessages)
+static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, struct csd_wait_state *state)
 {
 	int cpu = -1;
 	int cpux;
 	bool firsttime;
-	u64 ts2, ts_delta;
+	u64 ts_now, ts_delta;
 	call_single_data_t *cpu_cur_csd;
 	unsigned int flags = READ_ONCE(csd->node.u_flags);
 	unsigned long long csd_lock_timeout_ns = csd_lock_timeout * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
 
 	if (!(flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)) {
-		if (!unlikely(*bug_id))
+		if (!unlikely(state->bug_id))
 			return true;
 		cpu = csd_lock_wait_getcpu(csd);
 		pr_alert("csd: CSD lock (#%d) got unstuck on CPU#%02d, CPU#%02d released the lock.\n",
-			 *bug_id, raw_smp_processor_id(), cpu);
+			 state->bug_id, raw_smp_processor_id(), cpu);
 		atomic_dec(&n_csd_lock_stuck);
 		return true;
 	}
 
-	ts2 = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
+	ts_now = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
 	/* How long since we last checked for a stuck CSD lock.*/
-	ts_delta = ts2 - *ts1;
-	if (likely(ts_delta <= csd_lock_timeout_ns * (*nmessages + 1) *
-			       (!*nmessages ? 1 : (ilog2(num_online_cpus()) / 2 + 1)) ||
+	ts_delta = ts_now - state->ts_report;
+	if (likely(ts_delta <= csd_lock_timeout_ns * (state->nmessages + 1) *
+			       (!state->nmessages ? 1 : (ilog2(num_online_cpus()) / 2 + 1)) ||
 		   csd_lock_timeout_ns == 0))
 		return false;
 
-	if (ts0 > ts2) {
+	if (state->ts_start > ts_now) {
 		/* Our own sched_clock went backward; don't blame another CPU. */
-		ts_delta = ts0 - ts2;
+		ts_delta = state->ts_start - ts_now;
 		pr_alert("sched_clock on CPU %d went backward by %llu ns\n", raw_smp_processor_id(), ts_delta);
-		*ts1 = ts2;
+		state->ts_report = ts_now;
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	firsttime = !*bug_id;
+	firsttime = !state->bug_id;
 	if (firsttime)
-		*bug_id = atomic_inc_return(&csd_bug_count);
+		state->bug_id = atomic_inc_return(&csd_bug_count);
 	cpu = csd_lock_wait_getcpu(csd);
 	if (WARN_ONCE(cpu < 0 || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids, "%s: cpu = %d\n", __func__, cpu))
 		cpux = 0;
@@ -274,11 +282,11 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, in
 		cpux = cpu;
 	cpu_cur_csd = smp_load_acquire(&per_cpu(cur_csd, cpux)); /* Before func and info. */
 	/* How long since this CSD lock was stuck. */
-	ts_delta = ts2 - ts0;
+	ts_delta = ts_now - state->ts_start;
 	pr_alert("csd: %s non-responsive CSD lock (#%d) on CPU#%d, waiting %lld ns for CPU#%02d %pS(%ps).\n",
-		 firsttime ? "Detected" : "Continued", *bug_id, raw_smp_processor_id(), (s64)ts_delta,
+		 firsttime ? "Detected" : "Continued", state->bug_id, raw_smp_processor_id(), (s64)ts_delta,
 		 cpu, csd->func, csd->info);
-	(*nmessages)++;
+	state->nmessages++;
 	if (firsttime)
 		atomic_inc(&n_csd_lock_stuck);
 	/*
@@ -289,23 +297,23 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, in
 	BUG_ON(panic_on_ipistall > 0 && (s64)ts_delta > ((s64)panic_on_ipistall * NSEC_PER_MSEC));
 	if (cpu_cur_csd && csd != cpu_cur_csd) {
 		pr_alert("\tcsd: CSD lock (#%d) handling prior %pS(%ps) request.\n",
-			 *bug_id, READ_ONCE(per_cpu(cur_csd_func, cpux)),
+			 state->bug_id, READ_ONCE(per_cpu(cur_csd_func, cpux)),
 			 READ_ONCE(per_cpu(cur_csd_info, cpux)));
 	} else {
 		pr_alert("\tcsd: CSD lock (#%d) %s.\n",
-			 *bug_id, !cpu_cur_csd ? "unresponsive" : "handling this request");
+			 state->bug_id, !cpu_cur_csd ? "unresponsive" : "handling this request");
 	}
 	if (cpu >= 0) {
 		if (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&per_cpu(trigger_backtrace, cpu), 1, 0))
 			dump_cpu_task(cpu);
 		if (!cpu_cur_csd) {
-			pr_alert("csd: Re-sending CSD lock (#%d) IPI from CPU#%02d to CPU#%02d\n", *bug_id, raw_smp_processor_id(), cpu);
+			pr_alert("csd: Re-sending CSD lock (#%d) IPI from CPU#%02d to CPU#%02d\n", state->bug_id, raw_smp_processor_id(), cpu);
 			arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
 		}
 	}
 	if (firsttime)
 		dump_stack();
-	*ts1 = ts2;
+	state->ts_report = ts_now;
 
 	return false;
 }
@@ -319,13 +327,11 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, in
  */
 static void __csd_lock_wait(call_single_data_t *csd)
 {
-	unsigned long nmessages = 0;
-	int bug_id = 0;
-	u64 ts0, ts1;
+	struct csd_wait_state state = {};
 
-	ts1 = ts0 = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
+	state.ts_report = state.ts_start = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
 	for (;;) {
-		if (csd_lock_wait_toolong(csd, ts0, &ts1, &bug_id, &nmessages))
+		if (csd_lock_wait_toolong(csd, &state))
 			break;
 		cpu_relax();
 	}

-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10 11:29 [PATCH v2 0/3] locking/csd-lock: Report how long a CSD stall lasted Breno Leitao
2026-08-10 11:29 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-08-10 14:32   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] locking/csd-lock: Pack csd_lock_wait_toolong() state into a struct Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-08-10 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] locking/csd-lock: Report how long a stuck CSD lock took to recover Breno Leitao
2026-08-10 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] lib/test_csd_lock: Add a module to stall a CPU on a CSD lock Breno Leitao
2026-08-12  0:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] locking/csd-lock: Report how long a CSD stall lasted Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260810-csd-stall-duration-v2-1-795083bf04a4@debian.org \
    --to=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®