From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chuys@gmail.com>
To: frank.li@nxp.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tomer.maimon@nuvoton.com,
kwliu@nuvoton.com, yschu@nuvoton.com
Subject: [PATCH v1] i3c: master: allocate IBI workqueue with WQ_HIGHPRI
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:30:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810013059.3055787-1-yschu@nuvoton.com> (raw)
From: Stanley Chu <yschu@nuvoton.com>
The IBI (In-Band Interrupt) workqueue is allocated with only
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, which places IBI payload processing at normal
worker priority. This is inadequate given the time-sensitive
nature of IBI handling.
In the I3C protocol, when a target asserts an IBI, the SDA line
is held low until the master acknowledges and completes the
exchange. The IRQ handler (top half) ACKs the IBI, reads the
payload, emits a STOP, and immediately queues the payload
processing to the per-device ordered workqueue via
i3c_master_queue_ibi() — effectively the bottom half of the
IBI interrupt path.
If this workqueue worker is delayed by competing normal-priority
tasks, the IBI notification reaches the client driver late. For
latency-sensitive clients (e.g. sensors reporting alerts,
hotplug events), this defeats the purpose of using IBI over
polling. Furthermore, because the ordered workqueue serialises
slots, a backlog of delayed slots can exhaust the pre-allocated
IBI slot pool, causing subsequent IBIs to be dropped at the
hardware level.
Add WQ_HIGHPRI to ensure IBI bottom-half work is scheduled
promptly after the top-half IRQ handler enqueues it, keeping
the IBI processing pipeline consistent with the interrupt-like
semantics the protocol demands.
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <yschu@nuvoton.com>
---
drivers/i3c/master.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
index f1be38a640ca..8fdd67a031ff 100644
--- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
+++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
@@ -3505,7 +3505,8 @@ int i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked(struct i3c_dev_desc *dev,
if (!ibi)
return -ENOMEM;
- ibi->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(dev_name(i3cdev_to_dev(dev->dev)), WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
+ ibi->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(dev_name(i3cdev_to_dev(dev->dev)),
+ WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI);
if (!ibi->wq) {
kfree(ibi);
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 1:30 Stanley Chu [this message]
2026-08-10 18:27 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-09-17 14:51 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260810013059.3055787-1-yschu@nuvoton.com \
--to=stanley.chuys@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=kwliu@nuvoton.com \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=tomer.maimon@nuvoton.com \
--cc=yschu@nuvoton.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®