From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailout2.samsung.com (mailout2.samsung.com [203.254.224.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 607B33321A7 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.254.224.25 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786442088; cv=none; b=HNrREmOqXy0HgyfAyKTPYLajNTDQZPVC6bdezGVSzuy4oaG2kNaTO/60apcG8B4aOwhWQuK9ONP8bwvpUFaU8nkEXzKUa0raJ5bAY3FDkVCzoTg1XUN7CgJmATibnQu+vNpMNGK6Cu4D3atPXrqfexG5bDI748c8guxISoQrrlU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786442088; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uo/vQhlb8y5bwO3IrdLIPZDS9KrmctXPbz02Yc08Cro=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID:Date:Content-Type: References; b=j+wuuazKCi0AA698D5wJImpJZ2TjxaVvHfnbebGiJw1RMM0htO4sLdnd2ug2nsYh/NG7lVuSYIa6uvHNgcUBjj25LqXE3gi3umthHZPB7sI6U8Ysz1S0pscV5bXDrXUqKAKnWm8EXMwgJi/DN4BwuY2EoSuYJbl4ie+GSLBLYwY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=samsung.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=samsung.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=samsung.com header.i=@samsung.com header.b=QTJLqr4x; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.254.224.25 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=samsung.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=samsung.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=samsung.com header.i=@samsung.com header.b="QTJLqr4x" Received: from epcas5p3.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.41.41]) by mailout2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20260811095443epoutp023720d51c6eda0d69e7d17e42b88300f0~Kt5w-hHmZ1660616606epoutp02z for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:54:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout2.samsung.com 20260811095443epoutp023720d51c6eda0d69e7d17e42b88300f0~Kt5w-hHmZ1660616606epoutp02z DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com; s=mail20170921; t=1786442083; bh=f7g/g32kJcsQBACBhpVlNkw7qk91UwNmsYCyqe4PR0g=; h=Subject:Reply-To:From:To:CC:Date:References:From; b=QTJLqr4xz5s2r9iJlNWfKu4SR4AeMc5WPryCtG7jRMWKWFl93lt6blyEBLUavTXEN GXXfawUx3ftBoWVdjLr+Sq+R7Uuh+Hq0realiXp1AbXJrmsXzSZCq+gcQoDiOOaM4w KPFZ4rrhFk0rDdqODMfFQ2nNMo8bQOmRo/H/Z8fU= Received: from epsnrtp03.localdomain (unknown [182.195.42.155]) by epcas5p2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPS id 20260811095443epcas5p20d81d46c89f9f8e507c54b6fcf281087~Kt5wUN2eH2361623616epcas5p2J; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:54:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from epcas5p3.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.41.41]) by epsnrtp03.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4hK6RR16Wbz3hhTF; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:54:43 +0000 (GMT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] arm: backtrace-clang: fix wrong sp usage for unwinding Reply-To: maninder1.s@samsung.com Sender: Maninder Singh From: Maninder Singh To: Nick Desaulniers CC: "ardb@kernel.org" , "linux@armlinux.org.uk" , "nathan@kernel.org" , "nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com" , "morbo@google.com" , "justinstitt@google.com" , Onkarnath , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "llvm@lists.linux.dev" , Rohit Thapliyal X-Priority: 3 X-Content-Kind-Code: NORMAL X-Drm-Type: N,general X-Msg-Generator: Mail X-Msg-Type: PERSONAL X-Reply-Demand: N Message-ID: <20260811095443epcms5p238a0ccbc4e42db5355fb6f181ccaeafd@epcms5p2> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:24:43 +0530 X-CMS-MailID: 20260811095443epcms5p238a0ccbc4e42db5355fb6f181ccaeafd Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" CMS-TYPE: 105P X-CMS-RootMailID: 20260805045522epcas5p39659721ef26a447b71e860c2990a60c0 References: Hi, > Thanks for reviewing the patch, Actually I was not aware that ARM patches > has to go through this way. > Maybe that is the reason my last 2 bugfixes are also ignored from ARM side :) > https://lkml.org/lkml/2026/4/27/265 > > So I was checking the way and created account there to submit the patch. > I will post the patch to suggested site today for further checking. > https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ uploaded: 9490/1 backtrace-clang: fix wrong sp usage for unwinding https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=9490/1 Thanks, Maninder Singh