From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 618FD34EF0C; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786470731; cv=none; b=UuG92dLV0Hrwbd4MhAWp3ZaZkrZiZpzc0a/u0gP1eUTaSQnLnldRV5QFtdhg+A9A2RbJVjUzV1PTVH5Tg3XQWFI2MpXwFQqr09RhpPKRoW3eM5bco9wAbFjqK7h6hrlcF4u1yBpl9tB2dTLQI5u8QtWSccckzPgRt7KfxhMFzWg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786470731; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wEj3U44ZkgGmUeTbAIvUHA4HkefQyR81vQVs9Ff5Wsc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=qjj8cWXMF4OLMOH1Bcbh4fhZECacvpF1nJccgr9ZwiVJREvdxYBSbR7r9FR37lMWH7zi2MP45Oe/wzI++thdLBoDmMK45MU3VdcIwB5MRbTU1SLSVkagiTmEXFBqjx9Fz36D5uVU8G6Hp1sX+ODmHin920Y4cwzpZDcmJFTmVBI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=olzGZAoz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="olzGZAoz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59E9B1F00A3A; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:52:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786470730; bh=xgsj6giw+Z2i0aNaQTUB0L9TsWsLGJzJIS/7tZOy67E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=olzGZAozPJ4es450+f4IZR4P0/eQGPMY5kVhDQa0+pX/enKY5SGCc+4O2wChHMDVZ wE++Rc0APqKcs5jcy3gFy+e874HhZfsJNaSqlC1rAjO/agHhAMIRDYI3H3Swrwirv8 Vyb98RxsUSGhspVJWRtldmHovVq8r8msfUKuHVpoKzJl5+3QYaknXw48Q5TEdrvLhY OoDM4qXgKsA3DfD9IZ5jyJBcV/DtcmfQlNI3TMceDLPsoFbl0xUAOgBs3jBgQbFj4U fextE9zMtR3mk6A1FNVm5TXS5p3yIib3+2qL1ZN0WIvOXAxB0yuHTIL0Tsp8uFaG1C 2oZNsfVUV9N0w== From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , James Clark , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Clark Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , sashiko-bot , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH 5/5] perf dso: Replace assert with runtime check in dso__read_symbol() Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:51:34 -0300 Message-ID: <20260811175140.7235-6-acme@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0 In-Reply-To: <20260811175140.7235-1-acme@kernel.org> References: <20260811175140.7235-1-acme@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo dso__read_symbol() asserts that len <= jited_prog_len, where len comes from sym->end - sym->start (parsed from PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL in perf.data). Both values originate from untrusted file input. With NDEBUG (production builds), the assert is compiled out, allowing an out-of-bounds heap read when the BPF program buffer is accessed. Without NDEBUG, a crafted perf.data crashes perf with an assertion failure. Replace the assert with a runtime bounds check that returns NULL with an appropriate error code, matching the existing error handling pattern in this function. Fixes: aa04707f507e ("perf dso: Support BPF programs in dso__read_symbol()") Reported-by: sashiko-bot Cc: Ian Rogers Cc: Song Liu Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6 Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/util/dso.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dso.c b/tools/perf/util/dso.c index 8e16b919e80721f0..40b23b7cbb94049c 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/dso.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/dso.c @@ -2031,7 +2031,12 @@ const u8 *dso__read_symbol(struct dso *dso, const char *symfs_filename, errno = SYMBOL_ANNOTATE_ERRNO__BPF_MISSING_BTF; return NULL; } - assert(len <= info_linear->info.jited_prog_len); + if (len > info_linear->info.jited_prog_len) { + pr_debug("BPF symbol length %zu exceeds jited_prog_len %u\n", + len, info_linear->info.jited_prog_len); + errno = SYMBOL_ANNOTATE_ERRNO__BPF_MISSING_BTF; + return NULL; + } *out_buf_len = len; return (const u8 *)(uintptr_t)(info_linear->info.jited_prog_insns); #else -- 2.55.0