From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FD873EA96A; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 18:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786474575; cv=none; b=d0tRgqvJVVB4hhCLDpMM/nZjVtJMZKm48FzEdqOjdnLdegda7tSKrY7srhbap3rn6NXOstA0gZRG0lJNGcA/BzBDHsbYB2OrJM86pmrHXWPSuiHBYtdFoTe67+wFwT+3ySSq4xhZs9OCPKBMPPuuLQZC/WCAdXCtGNAnGIJbpQk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786474575; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TYzIM3nc1vd7btd9/T3y6M5boLaB0jF3Sp2JAOVYZpE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=TxMuzbxGiC4RaC9WcX9eK64fe7KJM9Az421SRbDAYSCI+mZRYt3/YzxtxIIzxjDtynX5feP5RSL+jLd3Ow9R5hzfMKhYxqCFUj8Pig9ikipkEut2MutS4BH4Px/6VVkp6CIfOsE4l5k/DpbNS23KRe0wvhlmcm88uOKq1+DNJd4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=j/d+NNBz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="j/d+NNBz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 390261F00A3E; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 18:56:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786474573; bh=HR2kKp7sgGTXW7+sIDB1ePIKe/b0SC6SUIJPkHa8n9w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=j/d+NNBz2P608w9uQSkmEuhHzepwkEd0ni2Mk1dKE/J9GkXg7PX1RcN/1zDEymebh bTFTkf79FGRTsf5b8IIiTx+B91hI4eAZczA7RX8/X8jKGx3+hiiNB6GEt6ijExIPvq nlS2k0jsgXN9AIkA6uuEpMQMH3f2PITjXcUTbisCasxcasBA/7YE19DKJH6LRc/af2 fJXctXbQxNSB+mbUBVVKxMkLs0l3tORbCv8t4vQnP85gSIFHnt3bZfsA62siSG8TuA qJKaBugUColAghFYftyLbKLZO1PKhFPIpREptpRjcTYNMRtYGW1NDbHVFpmUuSWdVn naM/6j6Q/OlAA== From: Sasha Levin To: James Clark Cc: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, Larisa Grigore , Vladimir Oltean , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Brown , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mehmet Fide Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Avoid setup_accel logic for DMA transfers Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:55:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20260811184500.stable-0013-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260811091322.3592403-1-mehmet.fide@gmail.com> References: <20260811091322.3592403-1-mehmet.fide@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Either way the behaviour is the same. On vf610 in DMA mode the accel path drops > the tail of odd length transfers and byte swaps under SPI_LSB_FIRST, and this > commit removes both. That is what makes it worth having in 6.12.y, whatever the > original intent was. cac7e5054115 ("spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Avoid setup_accel logic for DMA transfers") applies cleanly to 6.12 with no dependencies, so this is not a mechanical question - it is whether it qualifies. It has no Fixes: tag and no stable tag, and James reads it as a refactor. Larisa, Mark, Vladimir - was this a fix? If so, a Fixes: tag would let me take it here and on the older trees, where it applies just as cleanly. -- Thanks, Sasha