From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-13.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0ADF388391 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786634729; cv=none; b=imOmIa+JCd8pcsPk8KsmjAgZzg4wIeXlNJpphsnLGmidsWjVR+fQbffvd6NgrGI1vhai68Ko1kM0emJEZFFJ1m/E0aUqWrZ1GxDA4ZwGfqNT4Kz5a0ReYT/v+mpSUO1ImVs/ZLw+xrdiG7tCIKYXbfKy30+aIG5Q9U/B+g9r6D4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786634729; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RsqbY0RCU8Ls/knpKMfiJGL0HaQv4wOyuSTzrYc79yg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=TLDtW6nuqCqE/1LvjRn5w597JbyaaXhh2oofisDgKgFmYHDrFP1iNvMU6UVwvbbLryPkUWQCNfMX1A39GSV2+IUonBprihPk5ctaygPV65kt9TMadWlndqWm9VcfCVKlrS39/u4XPq9kDvtxPEeujt9MpGO8IN5ze/QyjqSYFH8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=ookBvmUR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="ookBvmUR" X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=RsqbY0RCU8Ls/knpKMfiJGL0HaQv4wOyuSTzrYc79yg=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1786634725; v=1; x=1787239525; b=ookBvmURlKNcUxFFgiP/izZmaZnAiKgfVwLlaidDbfgo1h3vhuYMXDJz5XyfdCeoZB2PMNsT cjKRKynyx52wSZTRepe+5od4IjbLbO2lh3VMzfmhQkIW2VZcHvrSZ2MZcKygNovAqHT1R3SFDbq SLaysfAvI7jhjL5yxLeD0Nys= X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from .linux.dev (117.20.149.103) by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 3e806838460a431b; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:25:25 +0000 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT From: Leon Hwang To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Jiri Olsa , John Fastabend , Quentin Monnet , Shuah Khan , Leon Hwang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com, Emil Tsalapatis Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v12 10/10] selftests/bpf: Verify bpf_iter for global percpu data Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:23:23 +0800 Message-ID: <20260813152324.97937-11-leon.hwang@linux.dev> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.55.0 In-Reply-To: <20260813152324.97937-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev> References: <20260813152324.97937-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Add a test to verify that it is OK to iter the percpu_array map used for global percpu data. Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang --- .../bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ .../bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c | 25 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c index d308ca3b3045..7d6bda909295 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c @@ -327,6 +327,56 @@ static void test_global_percpu_data_verifier_log(void) RUN_TESTS(test_global_percpu_data); } +static void test_global_percpu_data_iter(void) +{ + DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts); + struct test_global_percpu_data *skel; + union bpf_iter_link_info linfo = {}; + struct bpf_link *link = NULL; + int fd, num_cpus, len, err; + char buf[16]; + + num_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus(); + if (!ASSERT_GT(num_cpus, 0, "libbpf_num_possible_cpus")) + return; + + skel = test_global_percpu_data__open(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_global_percpu_data__open")) + return; + + skel->rodata->num_cpus = num_cpus; + skel->rodata->offsetof_num = offsetof(struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu, struct_data); + skel->rodata->offsetof_num += sizeof(skel->percpu->struct_data) - sizeof(int); + skel->rodata->elem_sz = roundup(sizeof(struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu), 8); + skel->percpu->struct_data.nums[6] = 0xc0de; + + err = test_global_percpu_data__load(skel); + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_global_percpu_data__load")) + goto out; + + linfo.map.map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu); + opts.link_info = &linfo; + opts.link_info_len = sizeof(linfo); + link = bpf_program__attach_iter(skel->progs.dump_percpu_data, &opts); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_iter")) + goto out; + + fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link)); + if (!ASSERT_GE(fd, 0, "bpf_iter_create")) + goto out; + + while ((len = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0) + do { } while (0); + ASSERT_EQ(len, 0, "read iter"); + ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->run_iter, "run_iter"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_data_sum, 0xc0de * num_cpus, "percpu_data_sum"); + + close(fd); +out: + bpf_link__destroy(link); + test_global_percpu_data__destroy(skel); +} + void test_global_percpu_data(void) { if (!feat_supported(NULL, FEAT_PERCPU_DATA)) { @@ -343,4 +393,6 @@ void test_global_percpu_data(void) if (test__start_subtest("rdonly_direct_write")) test_global_percpu_data_rdonly_direct_write(); test_global_percpu_data_verifier_log(); + if (test__start_subtest("iter")) + test_global_percpu_data_iter(); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c index d086e9417f9f..71ff8d1bf49e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c @@ -61,4 +61,29 @@ int verifier_snprintf(void *ctx) return 0; } +volatile const __u32 num_cpus = 0; +volatile const int offsetof_num; +volatile const int elem_sz; +__u32 percpu_data_sum = 0; +bool run_iter = false; + +SEC("iter/bpf_map_elem") +__auxiliary +int dump_percpu_data(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem *ctx) +{ + void *pptr = ctx->value; + int i; + + if (!pptr) + return 0; + + run_iter = true; + + for (i = 0; i < num_cpus; i++) { + percpu_data_sum += *(int *) (pptr + offsetof_num); + pptr += elem_sz; + } + return 0; +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; -- 2.55.0