From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BF073DA5B2; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 19:20:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786648857; cv=none; b=i61vS0TuI7/Tg3GQWnJlWWktM3QqQ15hMUYHAvG2YOfJWHVv/mz6C5bzbKrDQdGGT/pb+tm1bQLX+rJm7atD6iUGbkEnhGPwcLKGgKVcOJIhpmm2qdjfj5iJ23ozPH2CCkH1Qy0IZztIlq7mEId9CJL0ga3S6iNNM6gmSspcLNk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786648857; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QNt8/Qde7vjEN7KPOKBC8DQ2+43/aZN5rweVSiyuBQI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZoFwY5+OsHhwfIPOnoSfrZnTCvhSQKq567B3XAIZj5N9Unh2Zbgv4jiZv112d38f11tK7hQtqvfPCqdmMF1a4GY3HpNWrS2KL/QdUSqT5ARJkTfyZhaehuDTsTe1yKXsVG+c9fakpK0Yoh+APccI4DqAKe9jxP2XYio5QcmbDjk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dzVW4Ser; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dzVW4Ser" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56F631F000E9; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 19:20:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786648853; bh=X3bOKhCn8kLtXC55lbTCgNBqcSIXk5aW/+YdyX+riek=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=dzVW4SerxkqOk87jlhAXm9am4SrcPo+e8ip0RYFsHUmzvetGRWa95zNcQz6TPzI4s G4bS5tkSmpggqlTwIRBYGOMKcZaXr04U/8L2p97Tg2n3YzhF9Bs7+upUIrxPLE8stW 8kMmlSkZ1oJ13eAO8memBO7iah+48KxsTWJZG0fVUfp8+fzNIxVA8XQBuiFEZ4OByX dKl6+0bXkZqU8AS/tfilJR+NHizkfMw/PCgXZNVIQiqraaRIY3+VdP1PpybG8SNAen s7mVkIP1chDV2ArgxVO79qdsNDekNOK7PoZzvJVuqFQZo9QseQl1pUSPsBtwjBZLEj gfyyH2TudmNMA== Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 14:20:52 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Esben Haabendal Cc: Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Nikita Travkin , Maslov Dmitry , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , Thomas Gleixner , Pan Chuang , Yangtao Li , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] dt-bindings: iio: light: ltr501: Add ltr329 compatible Message-ID: <20260813192052.GB1981719-robh@kernel.org> References: <20260810-liteon-ltr329-v4-0-8bd3dfd15280@geanix.com> <20260810-liteon-ltr329-v4-3-8bd3dfd15280@geanix.com> <20260810155006.GA1815611-robh@kernel.org> <871pc3y0id.fsf@geanix.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871pc3y0id.fsf@geanix.com> On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 02:41:14PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: > "Rob Herring" writes: > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 09:11:13AM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: > >> LTR-329ALS-01 is an ambient light sensor similar to LTR-303ALS-01, but > >> without interrupt support. > >> > >> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > >> Acked-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > >> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/liteon,ltr501.yaml | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > sashiko issue should be addressed. > > I will. > > I guess it is best to add the new conditional statement under allOf, but > as we already have an allOf block at the top, I would have to add it > under that, which would place this new conditional statement related to > specific compatible strings before the list of those compatible strings. > > It should work fine, but it looks a bit odd to me. > > I could also add it directly as an if statement, but that would only > work as long as it is the only top level if statement, so that looks > like a bad idea. > > Should I just stick it to the existing allOf list? You can move the allOf to the end. Rob