mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alex@shazbot.org,
	schnelle@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v23 2/5] PCI: Allow per function PCI slots to fix slot reset on s390
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 18:25:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813232546.GA1281281@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805165518.794-3-alifm@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 09:55:15AM -0700, Farhan Ali wrote:
> On s390 systems, which use a machine level hypervisor, PCI devices are
> always accessed through a form of PCI pass-through which fundamentally
> operates on a per PCI function granularity. This is also reflected in the
> s390 PCI hotplug driver which creates hotplug slots for individual PCI
> functions. Its reset_slot() function, which is a wrapper for
> zpci_hot_reset_device(), thus also resets individual functions.

Sorry to come back to this yet again.  I understand the issue with
the wrong pci_slot being assigned for these s390 functions.

What I don't understand is why we would use slot_reset() in the first
place.  I would expect FLR instead.

The hotplug slot_reset() path is used by pci_reset_bus_function().
But given the order in pci_reset_fn_methods[], we would typically try
pcie_reset_flr() first, and we would only get to
pci_reset_bus_function() if FLR and the other resets are not
available.

Since these are actually multi-function devices, I'm surprised that
they wouldn't advertise FLR support.

> Currently, the pci_create_slot() assigns the same pci_slot object to
> multifunction devices. This approach worked fine on s390 systems that only
> exposed virtual functions as individual PCI domains to the operating
> system.  Since commit 44510d6fa0c0 ("s390/pci: Handling multifunctions")
> s390 supports exposing the topology of multifunction PCI devices by
> grouping them in a shared PCI domain. This creates a problem when resetting
> a function through the hotplug driver's slot_reset() interface.
> 
> When attempting to reset a function through the hotplug driver, the shared
> slot assignment causes the wrong function to be reset instead of the
> intended one. It also leaks memory as we do create a pci_slot object for
> the function, but don't correctly free it in pci_slot_release().
> 
> Add a flag for struct pci_slot to allow per function PCI slots for
> functions managed through a hypervisor, which exposes individual PCI
> functions while retaining the topology. Since we can use all 8 bits for
> slot 'number' (for ARI devices), change slot 'number' u16 to account for
> special values PCI_SLOT_PLACEHOLDER and PCI_SLOT_ALL_DEVICES.
> 
> Fixes: 44510d6fa0c0 ("s390/pci: Handling multifunctions")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci.c   |  5 +++--
>  drivers/pci/slot.c  | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  include/linux/pci.h |  7 ++++---
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 77b17b13ee61..350bae907ebf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -4897,8 +4897,9 @@ static int pci_reset_hotplug_slot(struct hotplug_slot *hotplug, bool probe)
>  
>  static int pci_dev_reset_slot_function(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe)
>  {
> -	if (dev->multifunction || dev->subordinate || !dev->slot ||
> -	    dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_BUS_RESET)
> +	if (dev->subordinate || !dev->slot ||
> +	    dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_BUS_RESET ||
> +	    (dev->multifunction && !dev->slot->per_func_slot))
>  		return -ENOTTY;
>  
>  	return pci_reset_hotplug_slot(dev->slot->hotplug, probe);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/slot.c b/drivers/pci/slot.c
> index 42ff66461f74..897223f01f6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/slot.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/slot.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,23 @@ static ssize_t cur_speed_read_file(struct pci_slot *slot, char *buf)
>  	return bus_speed_read(slot->bus->cur_bus_speed, buf);
>  }
>  
> +static bool pci_dev_matches_slot(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_slot *slot)
> +{
> +	if (slot->per_func_slot)
> +		return dev->devfn == slot->number;
> +
> +	return slot->number == PCI_SLOT_ALL_DEVICES ||
> +		PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) == slot->number;
> +}
> +
> +static bool pci_slot_enabled_per_func(void)
> +{
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_S390))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static void pci_slot_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *dev;
> @@ -82,8 +99,7 @@ static void pci_slot_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>  
>  	down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
>  	list_for_each_entry(dev, &slot->bus->devices, bus_list)
> -		if (slot->number == PCI_SLOT_ALL_DEVICES ||
> -		    PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) == slot->number)
> +		if (pci_dev_matches_slot(dev, slot))
>  			dev->slot = NULL;
>  	up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
>  
> @@ -187,8 +203,7 @@ void pci_dev_assign_slot(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&pci_slot_mutex);
>  	list_for_each_entry(slot, &dev->bus->slots, list)
> -		if (slot->number == PCI_SLOT_ALL_DEVICES ||
> -		    PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) == slot->number)
> +		if (pci_dev_matches_slot(dev, slot))
>  			dev->slot = slot;
>  	mutex_unlock(&pci_slot_mutex);
>  }
> @@ -299,6 +314,9 @@ struct pci_slot *pci_create_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr,
>  	slot->bus = pci_bus_get(parent);
>  	slot->number = slot_nr;
>  
> +	if (pci_slot_enabled_per_func())
> +		slot->per_func_slot = 1;
> +
>  	slot->kobj.kset = pci_slots_kset;
>  
>  	slot_name = make_slot_name(name);
> @@ -319,8 +337,7 @@ struct pci_slot *pci_create_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr,
>  
>  	down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
>  	list_for_each_entry(dev, &parent->devices, bus_list)
> -		if (slot_nr == PCI_SLOT_ALL_DEVICES ||
> -		    PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) == slot_nr)
> +		if (pci_dev_matches_slot(dev, slot))
>  			dev->slot = slot;
>  	up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index b628787e9485..43f80d6189a7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -79,17 +79,18 @@
>   * and, if ARI Forwarding is enabled, functions may appear to be on multiple
>   * devices.
>   */
> -#define PCI_SLOT_ALL_DEVICES	0xfe
> +#define PCI_SLOT_ALL_DEVICES	0xfeff
>  
>  /* Used to identify a slot as a placeholder */
> -#define PCI_SLOT_PLACEHOLDER	0xff
> +#define PCI_SLOT_PLACEHOLDER	0xffff
>  
>  /* pci_slot represents a physical slot */
>  struct pci_slot {
>  	struct pci_bus		*bus;		/* Bus this slot is on */
>  	struct list_head	list;		/* Node in list of slots */
>  	struct hotplug_slot	*hotplug;	/* Hotplug info (move here) */
> -	unsigned char		number;		/* Device nr, or PCI_SLOT_ALL_DEVICES */
> +	u16			number;		/* Device nr, or PCI_SLOT_ALL_DEVICES */
> +	unsigned int		per_func_slot:1; /* Allow per function slot */
>  	struct kobject		kobj;
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-13 23:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-05 16:55 [PATCH v23 0/5] [PCI] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali
2026-08-05 16:55 ` [PATCH v23 1/5] PCI: Introduce PCI_SLOT_PLACEHOLDER constant for slot_nr placeholder value Farhan Ali
2026-08-05 16:55 ` [PATCH v23 2/5] PCI: Allow per function PCI slots to fix slot reset on s390 Farhan Ali
2026-08-13 23:25   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-08-14  8:46     ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-08-14 13:26       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-08-14 15:15         ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-08-05 16:55 ` [PATCH v23 3/5] PCI: Avoid saving config space state if inaccessible Farhan Ali
2026-08-05 16:55 ` [PATCH v23 4/5] PCI: Fail FLR when config space is inaccessible Farhan Ali
2026-08-12 22:34   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-08-12 22:45     ` Farhan Ali
2026-08-05 16:55 ` [PATCH v23 5/5] PCI/MSI: Enable memory decoding before restoring MSI-X messages Farhan Ali
2026-08-12 22:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-08-12 22:35     ` Farhan Ali
2026-08-12 18:53 ` [PATCH v23 0/5] [PCI] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali
2026-08-12 22:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260813232546.GA1281281@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®