From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5937E2F361B; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 19:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786649113; cv=none; b=Ppb0OGs1HAw4WQTnYjby6Ml9TTcctdZu0wWkQh8eTGgm1fMnnSFTIyntoW1cdydcqbvF/83QGmoNfjoRygEY6VGDrQCqJ77ku3qUnmwVkLK1uSsMDy49ogixuDcV3aytFQjCswuS+TTerqhxrJzZm0QrrzQN+2yBjYCHTSRMuqA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786649113; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6ckX8TBN9F4koDpmJ3VXPg8frlr2wRrtyoiXs/hAf2s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LQNnnTccGG7It3/CKZz1fhWrZYXrAr3GhKzr8Pzjuy4yBGIC9YSPqzX1gAIkwdKv94Hj0AF5eYYgw+9d141Ns2L7AitSGXfdQopCK9jxBFyTZ8PZ8ked1qPbZlktHFcPSbQcSvEA6Wgqky1EZYW/vvY/z6zrhrOdCRLi9csH4zI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=EXEH6pBC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="EXEH6pBC" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1786649112; x=1818185112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=6ckX8TBN9F4koDpmJ3VXPg8frlr2wRrtyoiXs/hAf2s=; b=EXEH6pBCZT1h6t4HhRrBSPgOHCPH1KHS5OM/Y1kj3GWwGvFbxTXkaobg HbrDnz4Oy2hrZ1tYVhWarWgNWlIA/VwvfSN8HyWF23yke+mJGFoKinHVK /qWMwZHcT36ybhCALG4KZEWQXw76+8DTrYi1mitAbR/x2WzJGJGUneBwo UEB+LCCiZpsypX1uijgXV5C+Uanx0d+PliqMmuS22bEIMJOX1A90u/ito 1sw2FqQ392BTMYYMySjCfBwWRJ/V/yDWB+OGCc9PaZspxwZeJWcJbrUpu N4RMsfcykybGcBb26yeSt2RwNYxPM0M/b9OaIxhK+qrM344C0/vk+gfsl w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XOzOWMtzRmesGx96dJRqNA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: qNCdP1jqQfaHgMk4ThO+Zw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11874"; a="90909158" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,221,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="90909158" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Aug 2026 12:25:12 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Oqpf11YdSs6L1N3EWL++bQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Q5MnzNdXTLCvEt61Epmvzw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,221,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="269215252" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 6eda058d650d) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2026 12:25:10 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 6eda058d650d with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wub35-00000000WM2-2krK; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 19:25:07 +0000 Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 03:24:17 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jiaming Zhang , agruenba@redhat.com, gfs2@lists.linux.dev Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, r772577952@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller@googlegroups.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gfs2: validate stuffed inode size before unstuffing Message-ID: <202608140317.5gzCSRj5-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260705140620.1732914-1-r772577952@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260705140620.1732914-1-r772577952@gmail.com> Hi Jiaming, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on gfs2/for-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v7.2-rc7 next-20260812] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jiaming-Zhang/gfs2-validate-stuffed-inode-size-before-unstuffing/20260813-232845 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gfs2/linux-gfs2.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260705140620.1732914-1-r772577952%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH] gfs2: validate stuffed inode size before unstuffing config: powerpc-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260814/202608140317.5gzCSRj5-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 16.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260814/202608140317.5gzCSRj5-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202608140317.5gzCSRj5-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Warning: fs/gfs2/bmap.c:55 function parameter 'size' not described in 'gfs2_unstuffer_folio' >> Warning: fs/gfs2/bmap.c:55 function parameter 'size' not described in 'gfs2_unstuffer_folio' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki