From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 313F6399CF5; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 19:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786735689; cv=none; b=iPuCLe9Izo1cPnhIxrLY6OlsopIRCP+sSAnrjdplge3/y1caI1PcWGX8f6VyfwCa0lRVU3hpfNBUc7jY5kG0uzbMH1JX3i6EImglyv7nGZIQiO1JEwsMh7uiAnnU+VnERFcp7urTBEuZeT/Thublyf409anSGIcOmKiAc/KpZU4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786735689; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SSYQsbj6ZEE7A8qSrmzJSebTXjoAlcHbG+fX1kbjcus=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AZBzNm6sI9W237rO1NxXTMTQdP9lFynIH61k/P235HfugvZ40xFqDwMu9woxivdNNh/4bTqtCUrBJ6aC6kAYWF5kuoyIpfUyfDrsCvsmHmtJzMdWrM5V5lqBqVvsGR0ytHgcoKv2wFgkJF/5is7y3Y1ODtWa+bFYEDQcTDG2DNM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=I1zh5fMT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="I1zh5fMT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1786735687; x=1818271687; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=SSYQsbj6ZEE7A8qSrmzJSebTXjoAlcHbG+fX1kbjcus=; b=I1zh5fMT72ICw3Kx1LO9tIXWDhwuV6N+ZyAixlpKs0nsjyFEVE3CuTCy 7baHO09gtskjB+l7yIm6nB+rtHRa6zfkRzUwFTB1eG704Xg1EEbHjvI/2 TLmLLdFKwuzbp3rHZ7a1w781khU3eanIoaxGoS7txjRwoOBwYmUJhbTE6 1+ubcAWvjq54lwZeo1Iwo0BaxJbus/Hbw85hzYCRqBZldKpgwG2Vp/A/H A7vYCHkd0Oj+uT2ri/DL9x+rIN7ESlGirnS65A1Ngeaa1Gf/pUDhnAoW8 mj6MInzG8VArqhE+AcGkRiehw8KQeC0HxneWtxarbJHVCqIjysE4TsDby w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2ggSCd+nT5maU73D+iSxPw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: z/br76cTQR+FWAGEQoVkzw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11875"; a="87242107" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,222,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="87242107" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Aug 2026 12:28:06 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OMexIP8XSU6gEBTmQA43ew== X-CSE-MsgGUID: AVHscax6R4+PYxKolsurZQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,222,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="260066757" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 6eda058d650d) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2026 12:28:03 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 6eda058d650d with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wuxZQ-00000000Zwg-2PaZ; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 19:28:00 +0000 Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 03:27:38 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: quanyeyang via B4 Relay , Thomas Graf , Herbert Xu , Andrew Morton , NeilBrown , "David S. Miller" Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+ef8d17bae14efb960935@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, quanyeyang Subject: Re: [PATCH] rhashtable: use per-init-site lockdep classes for bucket locks Message-ID: <202608150357.9LheVOQg-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260801-fix-rhashtable-bucket-lockdep-v1-1-15a0f8ae094c@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260801-fix-rhashtable-bucket-lockdep-v1-1-15a0f8ae094c@gmail.com> Hi quanyeyang, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 0131b508c0e2489eac6e121135988f6eeb716f19] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/quanyeyang-via-B4-Relay/rhashtable-use-per-init-site-lockdep-classes-for-bucket-locks/20260815-014140 base: 0131b508c0e2489eac6e121135988f6eeb716f19 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260801-fix-rhashtable-bucket-lockdep-v1-1-15a0f8ae094c%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH] rhashtable: use per-init-site lockdep classes for bucket locks config: alpha-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260815/202608150357.9LheVOQg-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 16.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260815/202608150357.9LheVOQg-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202608150357.9LheVOQg-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1170 function parameter 'mutex_key' not described in '__rhashtable_init' >> Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1170 function parameter 'bucket_key' not described in '__rhashtable_init' Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1170 expecting prototype for rhashtable_init(). Prototype was for __rhashtable_init() instead >> Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1247 function parameter 'mutex_key' not described in '__rhltable_init' >> Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1247 function parameter 'bucket_key' not described in '__rhltable_init' Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1247 expecting prototype for rhltable_init(). Prototype was for __rhltable_init() instead -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki