From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2316E3B6C1D; Mon, 17 Aug 2026 07:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786950975; cv=none; b=fqAxIL7xjBrG82DFvgYXu3XG+T5UjJ1kncm4iDM4IvR4dyDyMm14OFKwTvt6VFXoarm+StTNEeq7s+qTPIul7k2i1dYe6L4tCzx7vFqG9RWFQ/zcMwzIwSNC6mAFQ+QLZYlQKPndy3bDJUQJNhqcPULi0nY32imAU5v3WlYDgDA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786950975; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kMKlIBl3NAuuM6jvx30dD/Hizd+fyHJnLS0PwEyzfBo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IIH/zBYcPyUUEp15AZNuF3ltBItSUlcrNt1H9EUQS3VktJcK/05vc2zWiby8ofTLMJ78ko7nryWWWrsIRWZq7Ymy9gyp5yj7m2jFC7OWbdAF8YanRPW0x8+qEWFL0McUxkkgcxmdJM9DINqY++jp9HQwNL7W0s8M840CCzypDCQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Ls9iI2r+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Ls9iI2r+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CA681F000E9; Mon, 17 Aug 2026 07:16:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786950972; bh=kMKlIBl3NAuuM6jvx30dD/Hizd+fyHJnLS0PwEyzfBo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Ls9iI2r+IlBlLw9a/a2pq380+4Uj4p8CPg37Pz3IGZq7RfdNs64ygbmNAoFmBPYZQ XCupHoFDg7lHseSajml1GcWDUKKp53Ug/1m/d4VR2KXi0EnaQu6tJnA8z1OMyC8jua ncy8dUte2S9BS/+u3r99QD8JIW6Ne649nZpSqlJakA38BclnVUN55lVUrfkFcAUfkm gtEELzBCzyBaFe4YKFlAgVwc7AcBN/D/7zZ/xWaMgZYoq4Xoub9qIYsH2veCwMJ7Do Dfd+C4Rvovr72/qUTDNsH9uraVuRBIa/um8PE01cWRDUPzspnQhOoz2NGfeIllKLnt 5hWhphvCtM8Wg== Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 09:16:03 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Yu-Che Hsieh Cc: Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Joel Stanley , Andrew Jeffery , Chia-Wei Wang , Corey Minyard , Andrew Jeffery , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, jammy_huang@aspeedtech.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed-lpc: Document lpcN alias for multi-instance SoCs Message-ID: <20260817-icy-peridot-mouse-ad50f6@quoll> References: <20260813-upstream_kcs_multiple_lpc-v2-0-775b1db3fe95@aspeedtech.com> <20260813-upstream_kcs_multiple_lpc-v2-1-775b1db3fe95@aspeedtech.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260813-upstream_kcs_multiple_lpc-v2-1-775b1db3fe95@aspeedtech.com> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 02:42:31PM +0800, Yu-Che Hsieh wrote: > Some SoCs (e.g. AST2700) expose more than one physical LPC controller > instance. Downstream devices such as KCS channels need a stable, We do not care about downstream devices. > globally-unique index derived from which LPC controller instance they > belong to, so document the "lpcN" alias convention on the LPC New aliases are generally not accepted and if your reason is "downstream", then answer is simple: NAK Best regards, Krzysztof