From: Denis Pisarev <pisarevden@gmail.com>
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
mario.limonciello@amd.com, ionut_n2001@yahoo.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Denis Pisarev <pisarevden@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/1] drm/amdgpu: MMIO TLB invalidation fallback when KIQ is wedged after S4 resume
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:53:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260819185349.29407-1-pisarevden@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
This RFC follows up on bugzilla 219492 ("failed to write reg 28b4 wait
reg 28c6" after hibernation) and on the resume_gpu_stable proposal
rejected in January:
https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/20260106125929.25214-6-sunlightlinux@gmail.com/
The rejection argued that (a) kiq sched.ready is managed correctly -
set false in suspend, set true again only after ring tests pass on
resume - and (b) the proposed flag would have disabled the KIQ flush
path permanently. Both points are correct, and this RFC takes a
different route: nothing is disabled proactively; the driver reacts to
observed failures.
MEASURED FAILURE MODE (Cezanne iGPU, Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, 7.1.8, KDE
Wayland, no ROCm):
- S4 resume -> "failed to write reg 28b4/28c6" + "1a6f4/1a706" pairs
begin in the same second as the thaw and continue at 80-140/hour
for 9+ hours until reboot. kiq sched.ready is true throughout (the
ring test at resume passed).
- Two user-visible consequences: each failed flush burns the ~5 s KIQ
retry window (desktop-wide sluggishness), and the invalidation is
then silently dropped (stale TLBs - correctness).
TRIGGER ISOLATION (single-variable tests, one hibernate cycle each):
- stock (GFXOFF allowed across S4): ~70-140 errors / 30 min of use
- GFXOFF held off across S4: 0 errors (30 min)
- GFXOFF re-enabled 40 min after the clean
resume: 0 errors (15 min;
gating resumption not independently verified)
So the wedge forms in the S4 resume window while GFXOFF is allowed,
and is consistent with the existing semaphore workaround comment in
gmc_v9_0.c about losing invalidate-acknowledge state across
power-gating cycles. A boot-time amdgpu.pg_mask=0 does not even
initialize on this part (probe -ETIMEDOUT), so runtime debugfs
control was used.
THE PATCH (1/1):
- amdgpu_gmc_fw_reg_write_reg_wait() returns -ETIME on failure and
counts consecutive failures
- gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb() uses its existing MMIO path as fallback
when the KIQ submit fails (invalidations no longer dropped), and
after 3 consecutive failures skips the KIQ path entirely until the
counter resets - so wedged systems stop paying 5 s per flush
- counter resets on every success and in gmc_v9_0_hw_fini(); each
suspend/resume cycle re-arms KIQ. No proactive disabling anywhere.
- gmc_v10/v11/v12 call sites unchanged and compile-safe (int return
used as statement); extending the fallback to them is trivial once
the approach is agreed.
This mirrors what the sibling PASID path already does (KIQ submit,
-ETIME on timeout, MMIO variant as fallback), applied to the per-VMID
path.
OPEN QUESTIONS:
1. Root cause in the S4 window: RLC/ME not processing KIQ invalidates
while GFXOFF is allowed? Happy to run tracing (amdgpu.vm_debug,
VM_INVALIDATE ack registers) on the affected hardware on request.
2. Should the latch be per-xcc-inst?
3. Should amdgpu_gmc_flush_gpu_tlb_pasid()'s KIQ branch share the
latch?
Patch 1/1 follows. Comments very welcome - especially on whether the
failure-driven fallback is the right shape vs. fixing the S4 resume
ordering directly.
Denis Pisarev
Denis Pisarev (1):
drm/amdgpu: fall back to MMIO TLB invalidation when KIQ is
unresponsive
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c | 15 +++++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.h | 4 +++-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.55.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-19 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 18:53 Denis Pisarev [this message]
2026-08-19 18:53 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu: fall back to MMIO TLB invalidation when KIQ is unresponsive Denis Pisarev
2026-08-20 10:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] drm/amdgpu: MMIO TLB invalidation fallback when KIQ is wedged after S4 resume Denis Pisarev
2026-08-20 10:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] drm/amdgpu: fall back to MMIO TLB invalidation when KIQ is unresponsive Denis Pisarev
2026-08-20 21:10 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] drm/amdgpu: MMIO TLB invalidation fallback when KIQ is wedged after S4 resume Alex Deucher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260819185349.29407-1-pisarevden@gmail.com \
--to=pisarevden@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ionut_n2001@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®