mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com>,
	Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>,
	Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libceph: Re-establish the FIPS keylength check in the Ceph code
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 19:36:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821193636.GB3141245@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821175312.GA3141245@google.com>

On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 05:53:15PM +0000, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Do Ceph session keys shorter than 128 bits even actually occur in
> practice?  It seems that the Ceph authenticated modes support only
> AES-based cipher suites, where the minimum valid session key length is
> 128 bits.
> 
> I wonder if the client should just reject session_key_len < 16
> regardless of fips_enabled.

It looks like this is theoretically possible only when CEPH_AUTH_CEPHX
is being used but the session key uses CEPH_CRYPTO_NONE, which seems
insecure and contradictory, and likely not ever used by the server.  I
suspect the ceph client should just reject that combination outright
(and also session_key_len < 16 as defense-in-depth).  It is up to the
ceph folks who are the experts here, but if there are unnecessary
footguns like this, they should just be fixed for everyone.

- Eric

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-21 14:43 Thomas Huth
2026-08-21 17:53 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-21 19:36   ` Eric Biggers [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260821193636.GB3141245@google.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com \
    --cc=amarkuze@redhat.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®