From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Youngjun Park <youngjun.park@lge.com>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/swap: refault on swap-in, not in the swap cache allocator
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 06:31:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826133130.806177-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825172604.3243589-3-alex@ghiti.fr>
On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 19:24:52 +0200 Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> wrote:
> The swap cache allocator evaluates the refault of every folio it
> allocates. zswap writeback also allocates through it: the shrinker puts
> a buffer folio in the swap cache to write the compressed data out, and
> that allocation is then counted as an anon refault (and, if the eviction
> looks recent, as an activation) even though nothing faulted the page
> back in. On a workload that writes back continuously this inflates
> workingset_refault_anon and workingset_activate_anon substantially.
>
> Move the refault evaluation out of the allocator and into the two
> swap-in callers, which read the slot's shadow before the allocation
> overwrites it. zswap writeback keeps allocating the buffer, but no
> longer reports a refault for it.
>
> The refault is evaluated before folio_add_lru(), as it was before this
> patch, so workingset_refault() still sets PG_workingset/PG_active while
> the folio is off the LRU: folio_add_lru() consumes both when it picks
> the LRU list, and under MGLRU when it picks the generation.
>
> Fixes: aae466b0052e ("mm/swap: implement workingset detection for anonymous LRU")
> Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
> ---
> mm/swap_state.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
> index bf8ff2d2dbf1..8046fea015c9 100644
> --- a/mm/swap_state.c
> +++ b/mm/swap_state.c
> @@ -483,8 +483,6 @@ static struct folio *__swap_cache_alloc(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
>
> /* memsw uncharges swap when folio is added to swap cache */
> memcg1_swapin(folio);
> - if (shadow)
> - workingset_refault(folio, shadow);
>
> node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_PAGES, nr_pages);
> lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SWAPCACHE, nr_pages);
> @@ -646,17 +644,26 @@ static struct folio *swap_cache_read_folio(struct swap_io_ctx *ctx,
> pgoff_t ilx, bool readahead)
> {
> struct folio *folio;
> + void *shadow = NULL;
>
> do {
> folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
> if (folio)
> return folio;
> + /*
> + * Capture the slot's shadow before the allocation overwrites it,
> + * so a fresh swap-in can be evaluated as a refault below.
> + */
> + shadow = swap_cache_get_shadow(entry);
> folio = __swap_cache_alloc_folio(entry, gfp, BIT(0), NULL, mpol, ilx);
Can this refault against a shadow from a different cache generation?
Another swap-in can replace this value, reclaim its folio, and install
a newer shadow while this caller is allocating. This caller can then
win the locked insertion but still use the older snapshot.
What I think should be done here is have an optional shadow output to
__swap_cache_alloc_folio() and return the value captured by the successful
__swap_cache_add_check() under ci->lock and se that output in the swap-in
path?
> } while (PTR_ERR(folio) == -EEXIST);
>
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(folio))
> return NULL;
>
> + if (shadow)
> + workingset_refault(folio, shadow);
> +
> folio_add_lru(folio);
> swap_read_folio(ctx, folio);
> if (readahead) {
> @@ -688,17 +695,26 @@ struct folio *swapin_sync(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp, unsigned long orders,
> {
> struct swap_io_ctx ctx = {};
> struct folio *folio;
> + void *shadow = NULL;
>
> do {
> folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
> if (folio)
> return folio;
> + /*
> + * Capture the slot's shadow before the allocation overwrites it,
> + * so a fresh swap-in can be evaluated as a refault below.
> + */
> + shadow = swap_cache_get_shadow(entry);
> folio = __swap_cache_alloc_folio(entry, gfp, orders, vmf, mpol, ilx);
> } while (PTR_ERR(folio) == -EEXIST);
>
> if (IS_ERR(folio))
> return folio;
>
> + if (shadow)
> + workingset_refault(folio, shadow);
> +
> folio_add_lru(folio);
> swap_read_folio(&ctx, folio);
> swap_read_submit(&ctx);
> --
> 2.53.0-Meta
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 17:24 [PATCH v3 0/3] mm: fix workingset refaults in the zswap writeback path Alexandre Ghiti
2026-08-25 17:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/swap: move LRU insertion out of the swap cache allocator Alexandre Ghiti
2026-08-26 13:21 ` Usama Arif
2026-08-26 15:23 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2026-08-25 17:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/swap: refault on swap-in, not in " Alexandre Ghiti
2026-08-26 13:31 ` Usama Arif [this message]
2026-08-26 15:22 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2026-08-25 17:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/zswap: preserve the workingset shadow across writeback Alexandre Ghiti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260826133130.806177-1-usama.arif@linux.dev \
--to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yosry@kernel.org \
--cc=youngjun.park@lge.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®