From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Xu Xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/ksm: mark migration stores with WRITE_ONCE()
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 20:32:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826203218.a8690c6bdeb7504ee7fd9ad5@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824112433.191301-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 19:24:33 +0800 Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
> ksm_get_folio() deliberately samples stable_node->kpfn and
> folio->mapping without taking the folio lock because the KSM folio may be
> migrated concurrently. folio_migrate_ksm() updates the same state using
> plain assignments.
>
> The reader can load the old kpfn, then the migrator can store the new kpfn,
> execute smp_wmb(), and clear the old folio's mapping before the reader
> checks that mapping. Thus the initial kpfn load can overlap its update and
> the subsequent mapping load can overlap the clear, with no common lock.
> This leaves marked READ_ONCE() accesses racing with plain stores.
>
> The kernel reported:
>
> BUG: KCSAN: data-race in folio_migrate_ksm / ksm_get_folio
>
> ...
>
> Use WRITE_ONCE() for both stores to pair them with the existing lockless
> reads. This preserves the existing smp_wmb()/smp_rmb() migration protocol
> and control flow while preventing compiler transformations of the shared
> accesses.
>
As usual, AI review looked at the surrounding code and went
nuts. Please check?
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824112433.191301-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com
I don't think any of these are truly pertinent to your fix (which I shall
apply), but maybe while you're in there and all fired up ;)
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 11:24 Chengfeng Ye
2026-08-27 3:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260826203218.a8690c6bdeb7504ee7fd9ad5@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®