From: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Nikunj A Dadhania" <nikunj@amd.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Michael Roth" <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Naveen Rao <naveen.rao@amd.com>,
David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com>, <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/bugs: Only log missing retpoline when it's actually the missing mitigation
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 17:22:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826222228.3668418-1-kim.phillips@amd.com> (raw)
spectre_v2_select_retpoline() unconditionally emits
"Kernel not compiled with retpoline; no mitigation available!"
when the kernel lacks retpoline support, before returning SPECTRE_V2_NONE
to its callers. SPECTRE_V2_NONE is not the final answer, though:
spectre_v2_update_mitigation() runs afterwards and can still upgrade the
mitigation.
On an Intel CPU affected by RETBleed, built with
CONFIG_MITIGATION_IBRS_ENTRY=y and CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE=n, and
booted with spectre_v2=auto, retbleed_select_mitigation() picks
RETBLEED_MITIGATION_IBRS, and spectre_v2_update_mitigation() then promotes
SPECTRE_V2_NONE to SPECTRE_V2_IBRS. The boot log claims no mitigation is
available immediately before reporting "Spectre V2 : Mitigation: IBRS",
and sysfs reports the machine as mitigated. The message is alarming and
simply wrong.
Drop the pr_err from the helper and emit it once from
spectre_v2_update_mitigation(), after the final mitigation is known, so it
only fires when the system really is left unmitigated. Guard it on
!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE) so it fires only when retpoline
truly cannot be built in, and restrict it to the cases where retpoline was
the implied choice: SPECTRE_V2_CMD_FORCE, or SPECTRE_V2_CMD_AUTO when
should_mitigate_vuln(X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2) indicates a mitigation was
actually intended.
Fixes: 480e803dacf8 ("x86/bugs: Restructure spectre_v2 mitigation")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-4-7
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index 82436b3534fa..46c68feef339 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -1956,10 +1956,8 @@ early_param("spectre_v2", spectre_v2_parse_cmdline);
static enum spectre_v2_mitigation __init spectre_v2_select_retpoline(void)
{
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE)) {
- pr_err("Kernel not compiled with retpoline; no mitigation available!");
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE))
return SPECTRE_V2_NONE;
- }
return SPECTRE_V2_RETPOLINE;
}
@@ -2247,6 +2245,13 @@ static void __init spectre_v2_update_mitigation(void)
}
}
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE) &&
+ spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_NONE &&
+ (spectre_v2_cmd == SPECTRE_V2_CMD_FORCE ||
+ (spectre_v2_cmd == SPECTRE_V2_CMD_AUTO &&
+ should_mitigate_vuln(X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2))))
+ pr_err("Kernel not compiled with retpoline; no mitigation available!");
+
if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2))
pr_info("%s\n", spectre_v2_strings[spectre_v2_enabled]);
}
base-commit: 8d3ae59288f1e7d58d76558a6ee96d533bc5019f
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 22:22 Kim Phillips [this message]
2026-08-27 4:59 ` Pawan Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260826222228.3668418-1-kim.phillips@amd.com \
--to=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=nathan.fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=naveen.rao@amd.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®