mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ju Nan <junan76@163.com>
To: antonio.borneo@foss.st.com
Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, junan76@163.com, linusw@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: stm32: fix the unit of the hwspinlock timeout
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 22:11:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260827141127.25789-2-junan76@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b0f76a08a7c1dbaec4684b4bc013263e0149a4b.camel@foss.st.com>

HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT is passed to hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(), whose
timeout argument is in milliseconds, not microseconds:

  atomic_delay += HWSPINLOCK_RETRY_DELAY_US;
  if (atomic_delay > to * 1000)
          return -ETIMEDOUT;

So the driver asks for a 1 second timeout where the comment next to the
macro says it wants 1 millisecond. All seven call sites spin on the
hardware semaphore with udelay(), from sections that hold bank->lock or
irqmux_lock, so on a non-PREEMPT_RT kernel this can keep interrupts
disabled for up to one second while waiting for the coprocessor.

The hwspinlock core documents this explicitly:

  If the mode is HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC (called from an atomic context) the
  timeout is handled with busy-waiting delays, hence shall not exceed
  few msecs.

Pass the value the comment always described. The core retries every
HWSPINLOCK_RETRY_DELAY_US (100 us), so the semaphore is still polled ten
times before giving up, which is far longer than any plausible hold time
on the coprocessor side. A timeout is reported with dev_err() and fails
the pin configuration or the interrupt allocation, so shortening it
degrades gracefully.

Fixes: 290a9f937e5a ("pinctrl: stm32: use the hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic() API")
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Ju Nan <junan76@163.com>
---
changelog:
v2:
- Add the "Fixes" tag
- Redefine HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT as HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260805032843.36961-2-junan76@163.com/
---
 drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
index d97057ec2..0d888d30f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
 #define gpio_range_to_bank(chip) \
 		container_of(chip, struct stm32_gpio_bank, range)
 
-#define HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT	1000 /* usec */
+#define HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS	1
 
 static const char * const stm32_gpio_functions[] = {
 	"gpio", "af0", "af1",
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ static int stm32_gpio_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *d,
 
 	if (pctl->hwlock) {
 		ret = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(pctl->hwlock,
-						    HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
+						    HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(pctl->dev, "Can't get hwspinlock\n");
 			pctl->irqmux_map &= ~BIT(hwirq);
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static int stm32_pmx_set_mode(struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank,
 
 	if (pctl->hwlock) {
 		err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(pctl->hwlock,
-						    HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
+						    HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
 		if (err) {
 			dev_err(pctl->dev, "Can't get hwspinlock\n");
 			goto unlock;
@@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ static int stm32_pconf_set_driving(struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank,
 
 	if (pctl->hwlock) {
 		err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(pctl->hwlock,
-						    HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
+						    HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
 		if (err) {
 			dev_err(pctl->dev, "Can't get hwspinlock\n");
 			goto unlock;
@@ -1132,7 +1132,7 @@ static int stm32_pconf_set_speed(struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank,
 
 	if (pctl->hwlock) {
 		err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(pctl->hwlock,
-						    HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
+						    HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
 		if (err) {
 			dev_err(pctl->dev, "Can't get hwspinlock\n");
 			goto unlock;
@@ -1178,7 +1178,7 @@ static int stm32_pconf_set_bias(struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank,
 
 	if (pctl->hwlock) {
 		err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(pctl->hwlock,
-						    HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
+						    HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
 		if (err) {
 			dev_err(pctl->dev, "Can't get hwspinlock\n");
 			goto unlock;
@@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ static int stm32_pconf_set_advcfgr(struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank, int offset, u32
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
 
 	if (pctl->hwlock) {
-		err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(pctl->hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
+		err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(pctl->hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
 		if (err) {
 			dev_err(pctl->dev, "Can't get hwspinlock\n");
 			goto unlock;
@@ -1317,7 +1317,7 @@ stm32_pconf_set_skew_delay(struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank, int offset, u32 delay,
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
 
 	if (pctl->hwlock) {
-		err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(pctl->hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
+		err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(pctl->hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
 		if (err) {
 			dev_err(pctl->dev, "Can't get hwspinlock\n");
 			goto unlock;
-- 
2.55.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-27 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-05  3:28 [PATCH] " Ju Nan
2026-08-21  9:22 ` Antonio Borneo
2026-08-27 14:11   ` Ju Nan [this message]
2026-08-29 11:20     ` [PATCH v2] " Ju Nan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260827141127.25789-2-junan76@163.com \
    --to=junan76@163.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=antonio.borneo@foss.st.com \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®