From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 866BE2C237C; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787840103; cv=none; b=cu8crQ7GnGj0/g/y0N49w/GAC1QTEnzfj1zx+hrkQvXDUnl0cQ/o8/Uv/1sIy4muQThmqe4DPuIUPvOra/7BPC8ZLTF2jNzk1s+5AKqRTTcZjdpuCCcLaoOFl8P0QFl8FTPH+F0IeriVfhfHLXyhe3RNXBrLMGGzbO7Leebo6hg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787840103; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SLdLa0pMFHH+VoCLh4TtrJHtWoNYre5NSKadVwaBbjc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qqVdryx+p4wSZeFrgOKNQKdhvvm/8gQ+hWJ2UxqNze3bxbCjYK3pSAZNvh23iDjmaPCtDyMxw2MTsSlpQa7juqDVuw/G29HCtgCcaLs411ySHAy+0+X/uwadnjR7bACzlxFLxW6sZIcoIDG1MI6qkpggBKa0HGndQOktSJ7BnPk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RZGVsSOv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RZGVsSOv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 218B31F000E9; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:14:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787840102; bh=N5Pjwr9q5Lrm7F1jrG3uhSnlHd4yCqTzaLDPEaCaejE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=RZGVsSOveZyIvm5WZivDtsmmbIKKsan6tyWd0bR8FHalBmBd1NuVcjQxmWy23Q3Gp SWYpJKb7zRnVxnCcfS682kgTEJrMdqYwqWteMOhNitY5Swp2m5CBVCr61TeKe62L4a NKYzto7QJLMBoJMH2ewhIViXGUJ3cU24lIJsueFdMBJC/FOhIGiWrXeGBVDJ7QItW2 qkEgrsFIP3xxyg/WLsdD6jpK3i1wx2eLJlwz2ACzkaS+JJdWAxIQ4ees14I+BMEGZK 3iL0NOG5sjhMqFCQS9UC+5pLMLpVuIJU5onA1zO0xDePOpi5VaIN9lZ+Dh/40CHHbZ BZy344bRFalow== Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 15:14:57 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Svyatoslav Ryhel Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Pavel Machek , Dmitry Torokhov , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] mfd: cpcap: convert documentation to schema and add Mot board support Message-ID: <20260827141457.GA2943942@google.com> References: <20260721095654.429346-1-clamor95@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, 19 Aug 2026, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > вт, 21 лип. 2026 р. о 12:57 Svyatoslav Ryhel пише: > > > > The initial goal was only to add support for the CPCAP used in the Mot > > Tegra20 board; however, since the documentation was already partially > > converted, I decided to complete the conversion to schema too. > > > > The CPCAP regulator, leds, rtc, pwrbutton and core files were converted > > from TXT to YAML while preserving the original structure. Mot board > > compatibility was added to the regulator and core schema. Since these > > were one-line patches, they were not separated into dedicated commits; > > however, the commit message notes this for both cases. > > > > Finally, the CPCAP MFD was slightly refactored to improve support for > > multiple subcell compositions. > > > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - fixed code style > > - rtc conversion was picked, so patch dropped > > - added audio ports description into mfd schema > > - splitted schema conversion and compatible addition > > - minor style improvements and typo fixes > > > > Changes in v3: > > - added regulator node names list into pattern > > - filled spi_device_id with driver data > > - ADC patches were picked, so changes dropped > > > > Changes in v4: > > - dropped regulator patches (applied) > > > > Changes in v5: > > - switched to MFD_CELL_* macros > > - switched to use determinator of model > > - switched to spi_get_device_match_data > > > > Changes in v6: > > - removed address-cells and size-cells from main node > > - changed macros formatting and OF matches > > - factored out common devices and made device addition staged > > - dropped cpcap->variant check for 0 > > - EINVAL > ENODEV in variant checking switch > > > > Changes in v7: > > - adjusted spi_device_id entries (name/driver_data) > > --- > > > > Svyatoslav Ryhel (6): > > dt-bindings: leds: leds-cpcap: convert to DT schema > > dt-bindings: input: cpcap-pwrbutton: convert to DT schema > > dt-bindings: mfd: motorola-cpcap: convert to DT schema > > dt-bindings: mfd: motorola-cpcap: document Mapphone and Mot CPCAP > > mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board > > mfd: motorola-cpcap: add support for Mot CPCAP composition > > > > .../bindings/input/cpcap-pwrbutton.txt | 20 - > > .../input/motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton.yaml | 32 ++ > > .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-cpcap.txt | 29 -- > > .../bindings/leds/motorola,cpcap-leds.yaml | 42 ++ > > .../bindings/mfd/motorola,cpcap.yaml | 408 ++++++++++++++++++ > > .../bindings/mfd/motorola-cpcap.txt | 78 ---- > > drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c | 143 +++--- > > include/linux/mfd/motorola-cpcap.h | 7 + > > 8 files changed, 571 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/cpcap-pwrbutton.txt > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton.yaml > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-cpcap.txt > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/motorola,cpcap-leds.yaml > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/motorola,cpcap.yaml > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/motorola-cpcap.txt > > > > -- > > 2.53.0 > > > > Hello Lee! May you please pick this patch set? I have included changes > asked by Rob and Uwe. Thank you! Nope! =:-) There are still a bunch of unanswered Sashiko reviews and one from Rob's bot. -- Lee Jones