From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vishal Badole <Vishal.Badole@amd.com>
Cc: <tglx@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<wangyang.guo@intel.com>, <tianyou.li@intel.com>,
<tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, <dan.liang@intel.com>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] lib/group_cpus: Snapshot cluster masks to keep grouping hotplug invariant
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:01:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260827170101.1261ed1ba5ce3d47adb41f24@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826171537.4167367-1-Vishal.Badole@amd.com>
On Wed, 26 Aug 2026 22:45:37 +0530 Vishal Badole <Vishal.Badole@amd.com> wrote:
> group_cpus_evenly() builds the managed-IRQ affinity spread used by
> multi-queue devices such as NVMe. That spread is meant to be a property
> of the static CPU topology: it walks cpu_present_mask and then
> cpu_possible_mask so every hardware queue owns a fixed set of CPUs,
> including CPUs that are offline at the time. A driver depends on that
> partition staying stable across re-computation - the CPUs a queue is
> given at probe must still describe the same queue after the device is
> later reset and its affinity recomputed.
>
> On an AMD system that stability breaks across an s2idle cycle. With CPUs
> 3-11 offlined and only CPUs 0-2 left online, the machine is suspended to
> s2idle and resumed. The NVMe controller uses the simple-suspend quirk, so
> resume fully re-initialises it and recomputes the affinity spread. The
> system then hangs for roughly two minutes and stays sluggish afterwards,
> the controller only making progress through its command-timeout poll:
>
> nvme nvme0: I/O tag 898 (3382) QID 9 timeout, completion polled
> nvme nvme0: I/O tag 398 (618e) QID 11 timeout, completion polled
>
> ...
>
> Make the cluster grouping depend on the complete cluster topology rather
> than on whichever CPUs happen to be online. Snapshot the cluster masks
> once while every present CPU is online and reuse that view for every
> later spread. Every spread then groups from the same masks, so the
> partition computed when the controller is reset matches the one computed
> at probe and each queue's IRQ still covers the CPUs it serves. If the
> snapshot was never taken, the cluster path is skipped and the plain
> present/possible spread is used.
Thanks, I'll queue this for testing in linux-next while awaiting
further review and testing input.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 17:15 Vishal Badole
2026-08-28 0:01 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-09-01 1:48 ` Guo, Wangyang
2026-09-07 6:12 ` Badole, Vishal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260827170101.1261ed1ba5ce3d47adb41f24@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Vishal.Badole@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tianyou.li@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wangyang.guo@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®