From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
To: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com>
Cc: mic@digikod.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] landlock: Document LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 17:40:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828.b569cf9602bc@gnoack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260809154544.1253100-5-utilityemal77@gmail.com>
Hello Justin!
On Sun, Aug 09, 2026 at 11:45:22AM -0400, Justin Suess wrote:
> Document setting no_new_privs with ruleset enforcement, following the
> same compatibility section style as previous ABI additions.
>
> Include a section explaining the tradeoffs of setting no_new_privs
> through any means for privileged users of Landlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v3->v4:
> - Reword the tutorial paragraph on CAP_SYS_ADMIN and no_new_privs to
> remove the ambiguous "it"s, per Mickaël's feedback.
> - Use the suggested "call (or ``CAP_SYS_ADMIN`` use)" wording in the
> compatibility section.
>
> Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Friendly reminder -- could you please also transcribe the newly added
documentation into the Landlock man pages? I added a tracking issue
at https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/66 where I outlined
the rough process, which is mostly mechanical. I am happy to do a
review.
I think in this case, it probably only needs an entry in the VERSIONS
table in landlock(7) and an update to landlock_create_ruleset(2) to
document what the flag does.
Thanks,
Günther
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-09 15:45 [PATCH v4 0/5] Implement LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Justin Suess
2026-08-09 15:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] landlock: Check landlock_restrict_self(2)'s flags before privileges Justin Suess
2026-08-09 15:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] selftests/landlock: Test LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Justin Suess
2026-08-09 15:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] landlock: Document LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Justin Suess
2026-08-28 15:40 ` Günther Noack [this message]
2026-08-09 15:45 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] samples/landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS to sampler Justin Suess
2026-08-09 15:53 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Implement LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Justin Suess
2026-08-09 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Justin Suess
2026-08-11 7:19 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Implement LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828.b569cf9602bc@gnoack.org \
--to=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=utilityemal77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®