From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-42af.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-42af.mail.infomaniak.ch [84.16.66.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46E39221DB6 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2026 14:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=84.16.66.175 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787926303; cv=none; b=Mm3nJ9cW1MDufHvHgrJ11XDm12Gc0bxK6wCIdG267rm4FSH+LKN6kqUhffuguZq3VVpWV8uFYd75HoPxYS3LRhc0zhoVcg/QJyEQB35nZIO3MnkBHPsgJSspJtWXppuvMUPl6zMkRo+PGeEVLgBgdRO2SZ8HRBj9qg/wZCYrD0Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787926303; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rfZQMJk0QojGeerF7VpON5SFK7fQIGAzTQKg6xW3DVQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bycYqFRP6WcfmnzL+LY6d/LBu/iwWANU9yqjFr1z6wi/koSap64t/3tADgX0V1CI5dWNydV8S+z5C7kBpB9sy25nKqV5UrKafY0KhhVWUVGIwy43XS+qIJJLvzQMZtaI8Uazmduo1wKU45kw94Y2aBzvfnOJa/UvG9XLJIJ6plw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.b=Gbh+Ih4x; arc=none smtp.client-ip=84.16.66.175 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.b="Gbh+Ih4x" Received: from smtp-4-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-4-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch [10.7.10.107]) by smtp-4-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4hWgKx4LLPzpKs; Fri, 28 Aug 2026 16:11:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digikod.net; s=20191114; t=1787926293; bh=Yj5d/n0eufWls/mWi+Enje3aRRyT1QVDgQ/a+c+prIY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Gbh+Ih4xZbzVGBWwXmmWWKAmQyfPnihRUYXqYzt+4sicqqiMli5IrIlt9k5LweGmI RLRvLaa1LJJiy9RO5KpxvxKAy/XkM3fG4AJyhF/RrJGG0E2wV29Bg9l6mFy3DaNb7N cRvvFGm4eGUwYXaFlk5HnrtqgCNMoxqJlweikMaQ= Received: from unknown by smtp-4-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4hWgKw5GhwzK0m; Fri, 28 Aug 2026 16:11:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 16:11:30 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Miguel Ojeda , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor , Andrew Morton , Bart Van Assche , =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=BCnther?= Noack , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] clang-format: Fix formatting of guard() Message-ID: <20260828.ye1xoPeeweel@digikod.net> References: <20260708105713.2073335-1-mic@digikod.net> <20260708.yi2Ve3eeGa8a@digikod.net> <20260708.kae9Abuath6i@digikod.net> <20260708.Ka2tahree8ad@digikod.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha Hi Miguel, Could you please sent the PR to Linus and Cc stable@? Thanks, Mickaël On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 02:49:35PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 2:34 PM Mickaël Salaün wrote: > > > > I guess parts 2 and 3 should probably be send for v7.13 (it's a big > > patch) whereas part 1 in 7.12-rcX, so I'll let you handle that properly. > > Sometimes I sent these PRs to Linus in -rcs, to catch new code, so it > should be fine, I can do it either way. > > > Yes, thanks. I'll keep the Landlock-specific patch I sent. > > Sounds good. > > > Yes, but I enforce it for Landlock, which helps a lot: > > Yeah, that is very good, and I am very glad to see it is useful for > you and that you could get to enforcement. > > What I meant is that it cannot really be "truly enforced" across > trees, especially if the config keeps changing and so on; unlike > `rustfmt`, where one is not supposed to push anything to linux-next > that doesn't pass. > > I mean, I would love if we could, but it is a very long-term thing. > Over time, my hope is that more subsystems start enforcing it on their > own and so on. > > Cheers, > Miguel