From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
To: tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Cc: yu.c.chen@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:20:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828022012.936112-1-zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59e2b8265fc650266b93d8f523c366edfa912428.camel@linux.intel.com>
From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
The ordering the skip depends on is not visible in the diff, so for the
record: dequeue_hierarchy() at fair.c:8148 reaches account_llc_dequeue()
through dequeue_entity(), and clear_delayed() runs only afterwards at
8164, so se->sched_delayed is still set when account_llc_dequeue() tests
it.
The sequences balance:
enqueue, dequeue +1, -1
enqueue, sleep, wake, dequeue +1, -1 set_delayed,
+1 clear_delayed, -1
enqueue, sleep, real dequeue +1, -1, skip, no re-add
load balance moves a delayed task source unchanged, destination +1
with sched_delayed already clear
requeue_delayed_entity() does not reach account_entity_enqueue(), doing
only __enqueue_entity() and clear_delayed(), so the wake path cannot
double count. account_mm_sched() cannot see a delayed task either, since
task_running_on_cpu() at fair.c:12245 requires task_on_rq_queued() on the
current cpu and the caller is update_curr().
sd->llc_counts is right to stay on queued semantics: both readers compare
it against another llc_counts value, at fair.c:11895 and 13228, so delayed
tasks shift both sides alike.
Reviewed-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Thanks,
Zhan Xusheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 13:50 sched/fair: which tasks should nr_pref_llc_running be compared against? Zhan Xusheng
2026-08-27 20:57 ` Tim Chen
2026-08-28 2:20 ` Zhan Xusheng [this message]
2026-08-28 17:08 ` [PATCH] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain Tim Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828022012.936112-1-zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
--to=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®