From: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
To: Shaomin Chen <eeesssooo020@gmail.com>
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
jlee@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] keys: Pin request_key_auth payload in instantiate paths
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2026 00:23:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828162316.GO6169@linux-l9pv.suse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526024838.3368409-1-eeesssooo020@gmail.com>
Hi Shaomin,
On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 10:48:38AM +0800, Shaomin Chen wrote:
> keyctl_instantiate_key_common() reads request_key_auth from the assumed
> auth key before copying an instantiation payload from userspace. The copy
> can fault and sleep. If the request completes and revokes the auth key in
> that window, the auth payload can be detached and freed before the
> instantiate path uses it again.
>
> A request-key helper reproducer can trigger this race. One helper child
> blocks in KEYCTL_INSTANTIATE_IOV while the original helper instantiates the
> requested key and returns. KASAN then reports a use-after-free from the
> stale request_key_auth payload in keyctl_instantiate_key_common().
>
> Give request_key_auth payloads a refcount. Take a payload reference while
> authkey->sem stabilizes the payload and revocation state. Hold that
> reference across the instantiate and reject paths. Drop the auth key
> owning reference from revoke and destroy.
>
> Reported-by: Shaomin Chen <eeesssooo020@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260519144403.436694-1-eeesssooo020@gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Shaomin Chen <eeesssooo020@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/keys/request_key_auth-type.h | 2 ++
> security/keys/internal.h | 2 ++
> security/keys/keyctl.c | 24 +++++++++++++++-----
> security/keys/request_key_auth.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/keys/request_key_auth-type.h b/include/keys/request_key_auth-type.h
> index 36b89a933310..01e42ee5f409 100644
> --- a/include/keys/request_key_auth-type.h
> +++ b/include/keys/request_key_auth-type.h
> @@ -9,12 +9,14 @@
> #define _KEYS_REQUEST_KEY_AUTH_TYPE_H
>
> #include <linux/key.h>
> +#include <linux/refcount.h>
>
> /*
> * Authorisation record for request_key().
> */
> struct request_key_auth {
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> + refcount_t usage;
> struct key *target_key;
> struct key *dest_keyring;
> const struct cred *cred;
[...snip]
> diff --git a/security/keys/request_key_auth.c b/security/keys/request_key_auth.c
> index a7d7538c1f70..282e09d8fa46 100644
> --- a/security/keys/request_key_auth.c
> +++ b/security/keys/request_key_auth.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static void request_key_auth_describe(const struct key *, struct seq_file *);
> static void request_key_auth_revoke(struct key *);
> static void request_key_auth_destroy(struct key *);
> static long request_key_auth_read(const struct key *, char *, size_t);
> +static void request_key_auth_rcu_disposal(struct rcu_head *);
[...snip]
> +
> +void request_key_auth_put(struct request_key_auth *rka)
> +{
> + if (rka && refcount_dec_and_test(&rka->usage))
> + call_rcu(&rka->rcu, request_key_auth_rcu_disposal);
> +}
> +
[...snip]
>
> /*
> @@ -150,7 +178,7 @@ static void request_key_auth_destroy(struct key *key)
> kenter("{%d}", key->serial);
> if (rka) {
> rcu_assign_keypointer(key, NULL);
> - call_rcu(&rka->rcu, request_key_auth_rcu_disposal);
> + request_key_auth_put(rka);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -174,6 +202,7 @@ struct key *request_key_auth_new(struct key *target, const char *op,
> rka = kzalloc_obj(*rka);
> if (!rka)
> goto error;
> + refcount_set(&rka->usage, 1);
> rka->callout_info = kmemdup(callout_info, callout_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!rka->callout_info)
> goto error_free_rka;I have a question when looking at the request_key_auth_new() in v7.2 kernel.
I have a question when looking at the error handling path in the
request_key_auth_new() code in v7.2 kernel:
struct key *request_key_auth_new(struct key *target, const char *op,
const void *callout_info, size_t callout_len,
struct key *dest_keyring)
{
struct request_key_auth *rka, *irka;
[...snip]
refcount_set(&rka->usage, 1); // here set refcount to 1
[...snip]
/* construct the auth key */
ret = key_instantiate_and_link(authkey, rka, 0, NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
goto error_put_authkey;
kleave(" = {%d,%d}", authkey->serial, refcount_read(&authkey->usage));
return authkey;
error_put_authkey:
key_put(authkey); // here the key_gc_work will call request_key_auth_destroy()
error_free_rka:
free_request_key_auth(rka); // Why is not `request_key_auth_put()` being used here?
error:
kleave("= %d", ret);
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
The request_key_auth_destroy() also calls free_request_key_auth() finally:
request_key_auth_destroy() -> request_key_auth_put() ->
request_key_auth_rcu_disposal() -> free_request_key_auth()
Direct use free_request_key_auth() in the error_free_rka path may cause
double free? Or I missed any information?
Thanks a lot!
Joey Lee
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 2:48 Shaomin Chen
2026-05-29 22:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <CA+TOyfhe=0Ty-FQDZy-9_LWJ6dgakzyjog5rNfQ2NdCc5X+dFQ@mail.gmail.com>
2026-05-30 16:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-05-30 16:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-06-08 3:06 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-06-08 3:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-06-08 5:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-06-08 5:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-06-10 10:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-06-10 15:21 ` eee sss
2026-06-15 11:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-08-28 16:23 ` joeyli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828162316.GO6169@linux-l9pv.suse \
--to=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=eeesssooo020@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®