From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: 4ncienth@gmail.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ip: skip IPv4 cmsgs for non-IPv4 packets
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 16:03:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828230334.384815-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825221922.85651-1-4ncienth@gmail.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
ip: skip IPv4 cmsgs for non-IPv4 packets
This adds an early return to ip_cmsg_recv_offset() when skb->protocol is
not ETH_P_IP, to avoid the IPv4 ancillary-data helpers parsing an
inet6_skb_parm as an inet_skb_parm after IPV6_ADDRFORM converts a socket
with an IPv6 skb still queued.
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
> index a55ef327ec932..24cb74c3d6202 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -171,6 +172,9 @@ void ip_cmsg_recv_offset(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
> {
> unsigned long flags = inet_cmsg_flags(inet_sk(sk));
>
> + if (unlikely(skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IP)))
> + return;
> +
[Severity: High]
Does this drop IP_PKTINFO on the ipmr cache-report upcalls?
For IGMPMSG_NOCACHE and IGMPMSG_WRONGVIF, ipmr_cache_report() builds a
fresh skb and never runs it through ip_rcv()/eth_type_trans(), so
skb->protocol stays 0:
net/ipv4/ipmr.c:ipmr_cache_report() {
...
if (assert == IGMPMSG_WHOLEPKT || assert == IGMPMSG_WRVIFWHOLE)
skb = skb_realloc_headroom(pkt, sizeof(struct iphdr));
else
skb = alloc_skb(128, GFP_ATOMIC);
...
} else {
...
ipv4_pktinfo_prepare(mroute_sk, pkt, false);
memcpy(skb->cb, pkt->cb, sizeof(skb->cb));
...
/* Deliver to mrouted */
ret = sock_queue_rcv_skb(mroute_sk, skb);
}
The ipv4_pktinfo_prepare()/memcpy() pair was added by commit bb7403655b3c3e
("ipmr: support IP_PKTINFO on cache report IGMP msg") specifically so that
mrouted/pimd get IP_PKTINFO for these upcalls, and the cb here is a valid
in_pktinfo. The daemon reads it through raw_recvmsg():
net/ipv4/raw.c:raw_recvmsg() {
...
if (inet_cmsg_flags(inet))
ip_cmsg_recv(msg, skb);
}
With the new guard, ip_cmsg_recv_offset() returns before
ip_cmsg_recv_pktinfo(), so the cmsg is gone for every multicast route miss.
Would this also make the two upcall flavours behave differently? The
IGMPMSG_WHOLEPKT/IGMPMSG_WRVIFWHOLE variant goes through
skb_realloc_headroom(), which copies the headers group including protocol,
so it keeps ETH_P_IP and still gets its cmsgs, while the alloc_skb() variant
does not.
The second case is the tx-timestamp error queue. ipv4_datagram_support_cmsg()
decides cmsg support from the cb and the socket tsflags, not from
skb->protocol, and pre-fills the pktinfo that ip_recv_error() then emits:
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:ipv4_datagram_support_cmsg() {
info = PKTINFO_SKB_CB(skb);
if (!(READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_CMSG) ||
!info->ipi_ifindex)
return false;
info->ipi_spec_dst.s_addr = ip_hdr(skb)->saddr;
return true;
}
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:ip_recv_error() {
if (ipv4_datagram_support_cmsg(sk, skb, serr->ee.ee_origin)) {
...
if (inet_cmsg_flags(inet_sk(sk)))
ip_cmsg_recv(msg, skb);
}
}
For an IPv4 socket transmitting over a software-tagged VLAN device,
validate_xmit_skb() -> validate_xmit_vlan() -> __vlan_hwaccel_push_inside()
-> vlan_insert_tag_set_proto() sets skb->protocol = ETH_P_8021Q before the
driver calls skb_tx_timestamp(). The clone queued on the error queue then
has protocol ETH_P_8021Q, ipv4_datagram_support_cmsg() still returns true,
but the guard discards the IP_PKTINFO that SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_CMSG is
meant to deliver for egress-device correlation. The same holds for any path
that rewrites skb->protocol (for example encapsulation setting ETH_P_IPV6)
before the timestamp clone is taken. The plain IPv4 tx path is unaffected
since ip_output() sets skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IP).
Would a discriminator tied more closely to the actual hazard avoid these
cases, for example rejecting only ETH_P_IPV6, gating only the cmsgs derived
from IPCB/the IPv4 header, or purging the mismatched skbs at IPV6_ADDRFORM
time?
The commit message says the change
"preserves the queued payload while omitting incompatible ancillary data,
and also protects callers processing a stale non-IPv4 error-queue skb."
Could this be extended to mention that intentionally supported cmsgs are
also omitted for genuine IPv4 deliveries, given the Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
tag?
--
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 22:19 Daehyeon Ko
2026-08-28 23:03 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828230334.384815-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=4ncienth@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®