mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan-Michael Brummer <jan.brummer@tabos.org>
To: sre@kernel.org
Cc: andersson@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jan-Michael Brummer <jan.brummer@tabos.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] power: supply: qcom_battmgr: report charge levels on SM8350-class firmware
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2026 07:45:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260829054546.86210-1-jan.brummer@tabos.org> (raw)

On SM8350-class firmware (everything that is not SC8280XP/X1E80100) the
battery reports no usable charge level to userspace: charge_full and
charge_full_design fail with -ENODATA and there is no charge_now at all.
As a consequence UPower cannot derive an absolute energy level and never
shows a runtime estimate - the UI is limited to "charging"/"discharging".

Patch 1 is the actual bug: battmgr->unit is only populated from a
BATTMGR_BAT_INFO response, which this firmware class never sends, so the
mAh guard on the CHARGE_* properties always rejects them. The values are
fetched from the firmware and stored on every access, they are just
thrown away again.

Patch 2 adds CHARGE_NOW. There is no dedicated firmware property for it,
but BATT_CHG_COUNTER carries the remaining charge rather than a
monotonic counter on this firmware. This is the part I am least sure
about, since it does not match the charge_counter semantics described in
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-power. Two measurements across the
SoC range agree with the reported capacity to within a percent, so at
least on this platform the interpretation holds. Happy to drop this
patch or to collect a full discharge curve if you prefer.

Both patches were tested on a Fairphone 5 (QCM6490) running
postmarketOS. Before the series:

    energy:              0 Wh
    energy-full:         0 Wh
    energy-rate:         12.4713 W
    percentage:          59%

After, discharging and charging:

    energy:              14.4347 Wh       energy:              15.6003 Wh
    energy-full:         16.8807 Wh       energy-full:         18.1505 Wh
    energy-rate:         3.39313 W        energy-rate:         7.3492 W
    time to empty:       4.3 hours        time to full:        20.8 minutes

Two observations that are out of scope here but worth recording:

  - power_now reports 72097076 while current_now * voltage_now gives
    ~11.9 W, and qcom-battmgr-usb/current_now reports 11078000 against
    an input_current_limit of 3000000. Both look like unscaled firmware
    values. UPower does not use either, so this series is unaffected.

  - state_of_health reports 100 while charge_full/charge_full_design
    works out to 96.6%, so the firmware appears to derive the two
    independently.

The time-to-full estimate is optimistic compared to the firmware's own
time_to_full_avg because UPower extrapolates linearly and does not model
the CV taper. That is expected and not a regression.

Jan-Michael Brummer (2):
  power: supply: qcom_battmgr: fix CHARGE_FULL* on SM8350-class firmware
  power: supply: qcom_battmgr: expose CHARGE_NOW on SM8350-class
    firmware

 drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2026-08-29  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-29  5:45 Jan-Michael Brummer [this message]
2026-08-29  5:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] power: supply: qcom_battmgr: fix CHARGE_FULL* " Jan-Michael Brummer
2026-08-29  5:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] power: supply: qcom_battmgr: expose CHARGE_NOW " Jan-Michael Brummer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260829054546.86210-1-jan.brummer@tabos.org \
    --to=jan.brummer@tabos.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=sre@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®