Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: avoid creating misfits during cache-aware balancing

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 10:41:12AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> Cache-aware load balancing biases tasks toward their preferred LLC. On
> asymmetric CPU capacity systems (e.g. big.LITTLE) the destination LLC may
> contain CPUs that are too small to run the task. Pulling the task there
> turns it into a misfit, trading a cache-locality gain for a capacity loss
> that's more detrimental to performance.
> 
> Guard both cache-aware migration entry points against this:
> 
>  - can_migrate_llc_task(): forbid the LLC migration when the task fits its
>    source CPU but would not fit the destination CPU.
>  - alb_break_llc(): veto the active balance under the same condition so the
>    runnable task is not pushed onto a CPU that cannot accommodate it.
> 
> Both checks are gated with checks for hybrid processors, so symmetric
> systems are unaffected. Tasks that already do not fit their source CPU
> are left to the existing LLC policy, since the move cannot make their
> fitness worse (this also preserves misfit up-migration to bigger CPUs).
> 
> Additionally, if there are misfit tasks found in the load balancing
> classification phase, prioritize misfit task migrations
> over LLC load aggregation on asymmetric systems. A better fitting
> CPU will boost performance more than better cache locality.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>

Tim sends patch, Tim adds SoB, yes?

Also, we start $subject with capital after subsystem: part.