From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com>
Cc: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
shuah@kernel.org, joabreu@synopsys.com, jun.ann.lai@intel.com,
yi.fang.gan@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 5/5] selftests: drv-net: Add VLAN test
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:49:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831164904.325ed438@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825164522.4244-6-ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com>
On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 16:45:22 +0000 Ovidiu Panait wrote:
> Add a test that validates ping traffic over VLAN interfaces. It aims
> to catch drivers which mishandle hardware VLAN tag stripping, in
> particular QinQ.
I take it back, sorry, looks like AI found something to complain about:
> +def _setup(cfg, outer_proto, inner_proto, hw_strip):
> + """Configure VLAN stripping and create the VLAN interfaces."""
> +
> + feat = ethtool(f"-k {cfg.ifname}", json=True)[0]
> + set_ethtool_feat(cfg.ifname, feat, {"rx-vlan-offload": hw_strip})
Does toggling rx-vlan-offload here actually change anything for the
802.1ad and QinQ variants?
In net/ethtool/common.c, netdev_features_strings maps the two RX VLAN
parse features to distinct bits:
[NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX_BIT] = "rx-vlan-hw-parse",
...
[NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_RX_BIT] = "rx-vlan-stag-hw-parse",
rx-vlan-offload is the alias for rx-vlan-hw-parse, i.e.
NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX (TPID 0x8100). Stripping of an 802.1ad S-tag
(TPID 0x88a8) is controlled by NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_RX, which this test
never reads or sets.
For the st_gmac/stmmac driver used in the commit message log,
stmmac_rx_vlan() gates each TPID on its own feature bit:
if ((vlan_proto == htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX) ||
(vlan_proto == htons(ETH_P_8021AD) &&
dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_RX)) {
and STAG_RX is only advertised for DWMAC_CORE_XGMAC, so on other cores
the outer-tag stripping state is unaffected by the flag the test flips.
Also, set_ethtool_feat() in tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/lib/py/feat.py
only programs the feature names the caller passes, and _setup() applies
them to cfg.ifname only, never to cfg.remote. The TX counterparts
(tx-vlan-hw-insert / tx-vlan-stag-hw-insert) are left untouched as well.
Would it make sense to include the corresponding STAG feature in the dict
passed to set_ethtool_feat() for the 802.1ad and QinQ variants (xfail or
skip when the bit is fixed), or otherwise document the limitation?
> +
> + _vlan_setup(cfg.ifname, LOCAL_IP, outer_proto, inner_proto)
> + _vlan_setup(cfg.remote_ifname, REMOTE_IP, outer_proto, inner_proto,
> + host=cfg.remote)
> +
> +
> +def _vlan_variants():
> + """Generator that yields the VLAN protocols and the stripping mode."""
> +
> + yield KsftNamedVariant("8021q_hw", "802.1q", None, True)
> + yield KsftNamedVariant("8021q_sw", "802.1q", None, False)
> + yield KsftNamedVariant("8021ad_hw", "802.1ad", None, True)
> + yield KsftNamedVariant("8021ad_sw", "802.1ad", None, False)
> + yield KsftNamedVariant("qinq_hw", "802.1ad", "802.1q", True)
> + yield KsftNamedVariant("qinq_sw", "802.1ad", "802.1q", False)
Following on from the above: do the 8021ad_hw/8021ad_sw and
qinq_hw/qinq_sw pairs end up running the same outer-tag configuration
twice on devices that implement S-tag stripping separately from C-tag
stripping?
If so, the commit message statement
"Three VLAN configurations are covered, each with hardware VLAN
stripping enabled and disabled"
and the module docstring entries for 8021ad_hw/8021ad_sw and
qinq_hw/qinq_sw would describe coverage the test does not establish, and
the QinQ mis-stripping case the test aims to catch would pass in both
variants.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 16:45 [PATCH net v3 0/5] net: stmmac: Fix double VLAN 802.1ad tag handling Ovidiu Panait
2026-08-25 16:45 ` [PATCH net v3 1/5] net: stmmac: Remove VLAN perfect matching dead code Ovidiu Panait
2026-08-25 16:45 ` [PATCH net v3 2/5] net: stmmac: Move double VLAN handling to a dedicated op Ovidiu Panait
2026-08-28 4:07 ` Joseph Steel
2026-08-25 16:45 ` [PATCH net v3 3/5] net: stmmac: Disable double VLAN handling on dwmac4 Ovidiu Panait
2026-08-25 16:45 ` [PATCH net v3 4/5] selftests: drv-net: Move _set_ethtool_feat() into lib Ovidiu Panait
2026-08-25 16:45 ` [PATCH net v3 5/5] selftests: drv-net: Add VLAN test Ovidiu Panait
2026-08-31 23:49 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-08-31 23:43 ` [PATCH net v3 0/5] net: stmmac: Fix double VLAN 802.1ad tag handling Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831164904.325ed438@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=jun.ann.lai@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.fang.gan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®