From: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>,
Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] KVM: guest_memfd: take the invalidate lock when unbinding a dying file
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 07:20:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901-gmem-unbind-fix-v2-1-12febe1d2216@amd.com> (raw)
kvm_gmem_unbind() takes mapping->invalidate_lock only if the
get_file_active() succeeds. When the guest_memfd file is dying, its
reference count is already zero so get_file_active fails and the binding
is removed without holding the invalidate lock.
kvm_gmem_invalidate_{start,end}() checks f->bindings independently to
decide whether to begin or end KVM MMU invalidation. So, the bindings
must therefore remain stable between the two calls. Otherwise, unbind
can remove a binding after start increments mmu_invalidate_in_progress,
but before end finds the binding and decrements it.
Example, unbind race with memory failure:
CPU 0: memory failure CPU 1: memslot delete
---------------------------------- ---------------------------
(guest_memfd file is dying)
kvm_gmem_error_folio()
kvm_gmem_invalidate_start()
finds binding
mmu_invalidate_in_progress++
kvm_gmem_unbind()
get_file_active() fails
removes binding
kvm_gmem_invalidate_end()
no binding found
counter stays elevated
mmu_invalidate_retry() then returns 1 forever, so guest page faults
retry without ever installing a mapping and the guest hangs.
Remove the distinction between live and dying files in the unbind path.
Always use slot->gmem.file and take the invalidate lock when it's non-NULL.
Normal unbind callers hold slots_lock, which prevents release from clearing
the pointer or freeing the file state until unbind completes. Final VM
teardown can only see a NULL pointer because guest_memfd pins the KVM until
release has cleared all bindings.
Fixes: ae431059e75d ("KVM: guest_memfd: Remove bindings on memslot deletion when gmem is dying")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260728092027.225CF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
---
Tested on a 7.3-rc1, AMD EPYC 7713.
Changes in V2:
- Treat a dying file as the normal case: always use slot->gmem.file and
take invalidate lock, drop use of gmem_get_file for unbind and fold
__kvm_gmem_unbind() into caller. (Sean)
- Drop NUMA selftests changes from this series, and will be sent separately. (Sean)
- Link to V1: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20260823-shivank-gmem-fix-split-v1-0-512a29fb8e86@amd.com
---
virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
index 625e62e1a031..21bb3710edfe 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
@@ -668,48 +668,40 @@ int kvm_gmem_bind(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
return r;
}
-static void __kvm_gmem_unbind(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, struct gmem_file *f)
+void kvm_gmem_unbind(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
{
+ struct file *file = slot->gmem.file;
unsigned long start = slot->gmem.pgoff;
unsigned long end = start + slot->npages;
+ struct gmem_file *f;
- xa_store_range(&f->bindings, start, end - 1, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
-
- /*
- * synchronize_srcu(&kvm->srcu) ensured that kvm_gmem_get_pfn()
- * cannot see this memslot.
- */
- WRITE_ONCE(slot->gmem.file, NULL);
-}
-
-void kvm_gmem_unbind(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
-{
/*
* Nothing to do if the underlying file was _already_ closed, as
* kvm_gmem_release() invalidates and nullifies all bindings.
*/
- if (!slot->gmem.file)
+ if (!file)
return;
- CLASS(gmem_get_file, file)(slot);
-
/*
* However, if the file is _being_ closed, then the bindings need to be
* removed as kvm_gmem_release() might not run until after the memslot
- * is freed. Note, modifying the bindings is safe even though the file
- * is dying as kvm_gmem_release() nullifies slot->gmem.file under
- * slots_lock, and only puts its reference to KVM after destroying all
- * bindings. I.e. reaching this point means kvm_gmem_release() hasn't
- * yet destroyed the bindings or freed the gmem_file, and can't do so
- * until the caller drops slots_lock.
+ * is freed. Modifying the bindings is safe even if the file is dying
+ * as kvm_gmem_release() nullifies slot->gmem.file under slots_lock,
+ * and only puts its reference to KVM after destroying all bindings.
+ * I.e. reaching this point means kvm_gmem_release() hasn't destroyed
+ * the bindings or freed the gmem_file and can't do so until the caller
+ * drops slots_lock, so there's no need to verify the file is live.
*/
- if (!file) {
- __kvm_gmem_unbind(slot, slot->gmem.file->private_data);
- return;
- }
+ f = file->private_data;
filemap_invalidate_lock(file->f_mapping);
- __kvm_gmem_unbind(slot, file->private_data);
+ xa_store_range(&f->bindings, start, end - 1, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ /*
+ * synchronize_srcu(&kvm->srcu) ensured that kvm_gmem_get_pfn()
+ * cannot see this memslot.
+ */
+ WRITE_ONCE(slot->gmem.file, NULL);
filemap_invalidate_unlock(file->f_mapping);
}
---
base-commit: cee9395acd8043be0644b25c34bfa86623f2b935
change-id: 20260901-gmem-unbind-fix-9f912bb3d3b8
Best regards,
--
Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 7:20 Shivank Garg [this message]
2026-09-10 8:43 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901-gmem-unbind-fix-v2-1-12febe1d2216@amd.com \
--to=shivankg@amd.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®