From: "Aaron Lu" <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>
To: "Wanwu Li" <liwanwu@kylinos.cn>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"K Prateek Nayak" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: Use cfs_rq->h_curr in the bandwidth paths
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 10:38:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901023851.GA4059187@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831101141.391382-1-liwanwu@kylinos.cn>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 06:11:39PM +0800, Wanwu Li wrote:
> Hi Peter, Ingo,
>
> Since commit 85570f10a4c6 ("sched/eevdf: Move to a single runqueue")
> the per-level "is something running at this level" information moved
> from cfs_rq->curr to cfs_rq->h_curr; cfs_rq->curr is now only
> maintained on the root cfs_rq. The cgroup hierarchy is kept for load
> tracking and bandwidth accounting, which makes the bandwidth paths the
> only code that still runs per-level and consults a per-level current.
> Two locations were not updated in this conversion:
>
> 1/2: throttle_cfs_rq() reads cfs_rq->curr to decide whether the
> throttled level has a running entity. For intermediate cfs_rqs
> the check is always false, so quota exhaustion never requests a
> full sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice() and never arms the deferred
> throttle task_work via task_throttle_setup_work(); a running
> task can out-run its group's quota until the next pick armed
> the work instead.
>
> 2/2: distribute_cfs_runtime() gates its clock refresh and runtime
> accounting on cfs_rq->curr, which never fires for cgroup
> cfs_rqs. Since commit 28ad5427682b ("sched/fair: Call
> update_curr() before unthrottling the hierarchy")
> unthrottle_cfs_rq() catches up unconditionally, so this is not
> a correctness hole today, but the refresh the check was written
> for is gone.
For this series:
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>
I also run a test where a nop is affined to a single cpu and I can see
that nop task can use more than its quota from time to time; with this
series applied, this no longer happens, so:
Tested-by: Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 10:11 Wanwu Li
2026-08-31 10:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Use cfs_rq->h_curr in throttle_cfs_rq() Wanwu Li
2026-09-02 7:22 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Wanwu Li
2026-08-31 10:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Use cfs_rq->h_curr in distribute_cfs_runtime() Wanwu Li
2026-09-02 7:21 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Wanwu Li
2026-09-01 2:38 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2026-09-01 4:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: Use cfs_rq->h_curr in the bandwidth paths Wanwu Li
2026-09-01 4:09 ` Wanwu Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901023851.GA4059187@bytedance.com \
--to=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwanwu@kylinos.cn \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®