From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Godana Emiru <godanaemiru@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: split chained assignments in _rtw_open_pktfile()
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 15:53:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026090109-stoppable-mockup-b819@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901110437.37588-1-godanaemiru@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 02:04:37PM +0300, Godana Emiru wrote:
> Fix a checkpatch CHECK ("multiple assignments should be avoided") by
> splitting the two chained assignments into separate statements.
>
> Assign cur_addr and buf_start directly from pktptr->data, and pkt_len
> and buf_len directly from pktptr->len, rather than chaining one field
> through the other. This avoids making the reader trace a dependency
> between the two assignments to see that they end up with the same
> value.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Godana Emiru <godanaemiru@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: Assign each field directly from its source value (pktptr->data /
> pktptr->len) instead of chaining one field's assignment through
> the other, per Greg's review comment that the v1 split was harder
> to read than the original.
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/xmit_linux.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/xmit_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/xmit_linux.c
> index 7a9d2fabc..9f0d84e2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/xmit_linux.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/xmit_linux.c
> @@ -14,8 +14,10 @@ uint rtw_remainder_len(struct pkt_file *pfile)
> void _rtw_open_pktfile(struct sk_buff *pktptr, struct pkt_file *pfile)
> {
> pfile->pkt = pktptr;
> - pfile->cur_addr = pfile->buf_start = pktptr->data;
> - pfile->pkt_len = pfile->buf_len = pktptr->len;
> + pfile->buf_start = pktptr->data;
> + pfile->cur_addr = pktptr->data;
> + pfile->buf_len = pktptr->len;
> + pfile->pkt_len = pktptr->len;
>
> pfile->cur_buffer = pfile->buf_start;
> }
> --
> 2.53.0
>
This was already done in the 7.3-rc1 kernel release in commit
cb08dcd0a896 ("staging: rtl8723bs: Split multiple assignments in
_rtw_open_pktfile"), sorry.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 6:21 [PATCH 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: remove a stray blank line in xmit_linux.c Godana Emiru
2026-08-27 6:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] staging: rtl8723bs: split chained assignments in _rtw_open_pktfile() Godana Emiru
2026-09-01 10:13 ` Greg KH
2026-09-01 11:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Godana Emiru
2026-09-01 13:53 ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-08-27 6:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: rtl8723bs: wrap long prototype of rtw_os_xmit_resource_free() Godana Emiru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026090109-stoppable-mockup-b819@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=godanaemiru@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®