From: Qinyun Tan <qinyuntan@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
"Qi Zheng" <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Xunlei Pang" <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Qinyun Tan" <qinyuntan@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/list_lru: don't copy stale shrinker id from non-memcg-aware shrinkers
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 19:51:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901115104.2944996-1-qinyuntan@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
With cgroup.memory=nokmem, shrinker_memcg_alloc() fails with -ENOSYS
for shrinkers without SHRINKER_NONSLAB, and shrinker_alloc() falls
back to a non-memcg-aware shrinker. On this fallback path,
shrinker->id is never assigned and keeps 0 from kzalloc(), which is a
valid id belonging to whichever memcg-aware shrinker registers first.
__list_lru_init() copies shrinker->id unconditionally, so every
list_lru backed by such a fallback shrinker (thp-deferred_split,
zswap-shrinker, workingset shadow nodes, superblock lrus, ...) ends
up with lru->shrinker_id == 0 instead of -1.
Under nokmem the list_lru collapses to the shared per-node lists, but
__list_lru_add() still calls set_shrinker_bit() against the memcg of
the added object. Most list_lru users are unaffected because their
objects resolve to a NULL memcg without kmem accounting, but the THP
deferred split queue holds user folios, which are charged regardless
of nokmem. Since no memcg-aware shrinker can register under nokmem,
shrinker_nr_max stays 0 and every memcg's shrinker_info has
map_nr_max == 0, so the first folio added by khugepaged triggers on
every boot:
WARNING: mm/shrinker.c:212 at set_shrinker_bit+0x99/0xa0
On systems where a SHRINKER_NONSLAB shrinker (btrfs, xfs) did register
and expand the maps, there is no warning; instead bit 0 is set
spuriously for an unrelated shrinker.
shrinker->id is only meaningful while SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE is set,
and all readers inside mm/shrinker.c already check the flag before
using the id. Make __list_lru_init() do the same and fall back to -1,
so set_shrinker_bit() is never reached with a bogus id. The stale
shrinker->id itself is left as is; cleaning that up is a separate
topic.
Fixes: 03375203e1da8 ("mm: do not allocate shrinker info with cgroup.memory=nokmem")
Signed-off-by: Qinyun Tan <qinyuntan@linux.alibaba.com>
---
Verified on a machine booting with cgroup.memory=nokmem and
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y: the warning fires once per boot from
khugepaged, disappears when nokmem is removed from the command line,
and no longer triggers with this fix applied and nokmem set.
mm/list_lru.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
index 36662d02ff963..96d02ea206a88 100644
--- a/mm/list_lru.c
+++ b/mm/list_lru.c
@@ -666,7 +666,12 @@ int __list_lru_init(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware, struct shrinker *shr
int i;
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
- if (shrinker)
+ /*
+ * If the shrinker fell back to being non-memcg-aware (e.g. with
+ * cgroup.memory=nokmem), its id was never assigned and holds a
+ * stale 0. Don't let set_shrinker_bit() act on it.
+ */
+ if (shrinker && (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE))
lru->shrinker_id = shrinker->id;
else
lru->shrinker_id = -1;
--
2.43.7
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 11:51 Qinyun Tan [this message]
2026-09-01 17:29 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-02 3:20 ` Qinyun Tan
2026-09-02 2:25 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-02 5:30 ` Baolin Wang
2026-09-02 17:17 ` Michal Koutný
2026-09-03 4:06 ` Qinyun Tan
2026-09-03 9:20 ` Michal Koutný
2026-09-04 2:10 ` Qinyun Tan
2026-09-04 4:30 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-03 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-04 19:43 ` Wentao Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901115104.2944996-1-qinyuntan@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=qinyuntan@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®