From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jesus Olmos <sha0@badchecksum.net>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: bound WPS attribute copy in rtw_get_wps_attr_content()
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 10:16:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026090133-postwar-kebab-83f0@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901072249.366750-1-sha0@badchecksum.net>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 09:22:49AM +0200, Jesus Olmos wrote:
> rtw_get_wps_attr_content() copies attr_len - 4 (the WPS attribute's 2-byte
> data-length field, up to 0xffff) from a WPS information element into the
> caller's buffer with no destination-size bound:
>
> memcpy(buf_content, attr_ptr + 4, attr_len - 4);
>
> The information element comes straight from a received beacon / probe
> response: collect_bss_info() copies the frame's IEs verbatim into
> bssid->ies, which reaches the scan queue, so attr_len is attacker
> controlled. rtw_cfg80211_inform_bss() and two sites in rtw_mlme_ext.c call
> this for WPS_ATTR_SELECTED_REGISTRAR with a one-byte destination (u8 sr /
> u8 selected_registrar), because that attribute is a single byte by spec. A
> frame that declares a longer Selected Registrar attribute therefore
> overflows the one-byte stack variable during a scan, which happens
> automatically (NetworkManager/iwd), giving an unauthenticated adjacent
> attacker a remote stack buffer overflow (at minimum a stack-protector
> panic).
>
> Commit 1463ca3ec660 ("staging: rtl8723bs: fix OOB reads in rtw_get_sec_ie(),
> rtw_get_wapi_ie(), and rtw_get_wps_attr()") added a bounds check for the
> attribute header in rtw_get_wps_attr() but not for the attribute data
> length, and did not touch rtw_get_wps_attr_content(), so the copy remained
> both an out-of-bounds read of the attribute data and an out-of-bounds write
> of the destination.
>
> Reject attributes that claim more data than the IE holds (fixing the
> out-of-bounds read and the latent memcpy(buf_attr, ...) in
> rtw_get_wps_attr()), give rtw_get_wps_attr_content() the destination buffer
> size, and clamp the copy to it.
>
> Found using mwemu (https://github.com/sha0coder/mwemu).
So shouldn't this have an Assisted-by: tag?
And have you tested this on real hardware?
Also, this looks a bit wrong, you have an endless loop in this patch :(
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 7:22 Jesus Olmos
2026-09-01 8:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-09-01 9:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Jesus Olmos
2026-09-01 9:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026090133-postwar-kebab-83f0@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sha0@badchecksum.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®