From: Tristan Madani <tristmd@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v4] net: reduce XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT under KASAN
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 12:30:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902123040.2172805-1-tristmd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727200454.4048141-1-tristmd@gmail.com>
From: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
Virtual network devices (ipvlan, macvlan, bonding) can enter legitimate
transmit recursion when combined with packet forwarding configurations
such as IPVS NAT. The existing XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT (8) in
__dev_queue_xmit() detects and breaks these loops, but the allowed
depth is too high for KASAN-instrumented kernels: each recursion level
consumes significantly more stack due to KASAN inline instrumentation,
and the cumulative usage overflows the kernel stack before the limit
fires.
On x86_64, CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC doubles THREAD_SIZE from 16KB to 32KB
(KASAN_STACK_ORDER=1), but KASAN per-access checks inflate individual
function frames by roughly 2-3x. For an ipvlan L3 + IPVS NAT routing
loop, objdump measurements on a non-KASAN kernel show ~1.4KB of stack
consumed per recursion level (across 17 functions from __dev_queue_xmit
through the full IP output path and back). At KASAN ~2.3x inflation
factor that becomes ~3.3KB per level. Eight levels -- the current
limit -- consume ~26KB plus the initial call chain (~8KB), which
exceeds the 32KB KASAN stack. The overflow hits the VMAP_STACK guard
page and causes a non-recoverable kernel panic (BUG: stack guard page
was hit).
On non-KASAN kernels the same loop is safely caught by the existing
limit: the "Dead loop on virtual device" message fires and the packet
is dropped without any stack overflow.
Reduce XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT to 4 when CONFIG_KASAN is enabled.
The deepest legitimate transmit recursion observed in the kernel
selftests is 5 levels of __dev_queue_xmit nesting, in VXLAN symmetric
routing topologies with VRF (vxlan_symmetric, vxlan_asymmetric):
__dev_queue_xmit(vrf) depth 1
__dev_queue_xmit(vlan-svi) depth 2
__dev_queue_xmit(bridge) depth 3
__dev_queue_xmit(vxlan) depth 4
__dev_queue_xmit(veth) depth 5
Since the recursion check fires when the counter exceeds the limit
(strictly greater than), a limit of 4 permits 5 levels of nesting
while blocking the 6th. At ~3.3KB per level, five levels consume
~16.5KB; combined with the ~8KB initial call chain, total usage is
~24.5KB -- well within the 32KB KASAN stack with ~7.5KB of margin.
A limit of 3 (v2/v3 of this patch) allows only 4 levels, which broke
the VXLAN symmetric selftests: the 5th __dev_queue_xmit call was
incorrectly dropped, as reported by Jakub Kicinski and the kernel test
robot.
The recursion path triggering this is:
__dev_queue_xmit -> dev_hard_start_xmit -> ipvlan_start_xmit
-> ipvlan_queue_xmit -> ipvlan_process_outbound -> ip_local_out
-> nf_hook (IPVS) -> ip_vs_in_hook -> ip_vs_nat_xmit -> ip_output
-> ip_finish_output2 -> neigh_resolve_output -> __dev_queue_xmit
Tested:
- KASAN kernel (6.8.12 x86_64): panic before fix, "Dead loop"
drop after fix (at recursion level 4 instead of 8).
- Non-KASAN kernel (6.8.12 x86_64): "Dead loop" drop both before
and after fix (no behavior change for production kernels).
- Measured max __dev_queue_xmit nesting depth via bpftrace in a
VXLAN symmetric cross-VLAN topology (VRF + VLAN + bridge + VXLAN +
veth underlay): 5 levels, confirming limit=4 is sufficient.
Fixes: 2ad7bf363841 ("ipvlan: Initial check-in of the IPVLAN driver.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
---
v4: Raise the KASAN limit from 3 to 4 after investigating the recursion
depth of VXLAN symmetric forwarding selftests. Measured max nesting
depth of 5 via bpftrace (VRF + VLAN + bridge + VXLAN + underlay),
which requires limit >= 4. Limit 3 (v2/v3) incorrectly dropped the
5th call, breaking cross-VLAN tests, as reported by Jakub Kicinski
and the kernel test robot.
v3: Resend as new thread per Jakub Kicinski request (no code change
from v2).
v2: Switch from per-driver recursion guard in ipvlan_core.c to
reducing the global XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT under CONFIG_KASAN,
as suggested by Eric Dumazet.
https://lore.kernel.org/20260711204700.1760374-1-tristmd@gmail.com
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20260711134732.1385563-1-tristmd@gmail.com
include/linux/netdevice.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 87cafc932e9e6..3ccd1e65bcd9e 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3669,7 +3669,11 @@ struct page_pool_bh {
};
DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct page_pool_bh, system_page_pool);
+#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
+#define XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT 4
+#else
#define XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT 8
+#endif
#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
static inline int dev_recursion_level(void)
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 20:04 [PATCH net v3] " Tristan Madani
2026-07-27 23:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-12 8:55 ` kernel test robot
2026-09-02 12:30 ` Tristan Madani [this message]
2026-09-04 0:32 ` [PATCH net v4] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-04 23:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902123040.2172805-1-tristmd@gmail.com \
--to=tristmd@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maheshb@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tristan@talencesecurity.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®