From: Ali Firas <alishmery18@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, idosch@nvidia.com,
razor@blackwall.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ali Firas <alishmery18@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] vxlan: vnifilter: validate the VNI range in vni_filter_entry_policy
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 18:46:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902154609.594009-1-alishmery18@gmail.com> (raw)
VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_START and VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_END are declared as
bare NLA_U32, so neither is range-checked before vxlan_process_vni_filter()
passes them to vxlan_vni_add_del():
int v, err = 0;
for (v = start_vni; v <= end_vni; v++) {
v is int and end_vni is __u32, so the comparison is unsigned. With
end_vni == U32_MAX the loop cannot terminate through its own condition:
v reaches U32_MAX, wraps to 0, and 0 <= U32_MAX is true again, so the
request never returns. It runs under rtnl_lock, which is global rather
than per-netns, so every network configuration operation on the host
blocks for as long as it runs, in every namespace.
The interface is reachable without privilege: creating the device and
adding VNIs only requires CAP_NET_ADMIN in the network namespace's user
namespace, so an unprivileged user inside unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER |
CLONE_NEWNET) can trigger this with a single netlink message. A VNI at or
above VXLAN_N_VID is also accepted and stored, although the VXLAN header
carries only 24 bits.
The MDB interface in the same driver already range-validates its VNI
attributes with an identical constraint (vxlan_mdb.c, vni_range with
.max = VXLAN_N_VID - 1). Apply the same validation here.
This removes the non-terminating case and rejects VNIs the header cannot
carry. It does not bound the cost of a request spanning the whole
legitimate 24-bit space: that still creates 2^24 nodes, each with a
per-CPU stats block, under rtnl_lock and with no reschedule point, and
neither allocation carries __GFP_ACCOUNT. Bounding or accounting that is
a separate change and is not attempted here.
Tested in a QEMU guest on a KASAN kernel with 2G of memory, as an
unprivileged uid inside unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER | CLONE_NEWNET). Before the
change, a request with START=0 and END=0xFFFFFFFF drives a global OOM
with the allocating task in vxlan_vnifilter_process(); after it, the same
request is rejected and in-range VNI addition is unaffected. A request
spanning the full in-range space, START=0 END=0xFFFFFF, still exhausts
memory on that guest both before and after, as described above.
Reproducer available on request.
Fixes: f9c4bb0b245c ("vxlan: vni filtering support on collect metadata device")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-6
Signed-off-by: Ali Firas <alishmery18@gmail.com>
---
v2: rewrite the changelog to describe only what the patch closes and
state explicitly that the cost of a full in-range request is not
bounded here. No code changes.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260829030041.940594-1-alishmery18@gmail.com/
drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
index dd94085e0886..9e86ac39cf9d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
@@ -459,9 +459,15 @@ static int vxlan_vnifilter_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb
return err;
}
+static const struct netlink_range_validation vni_filter_vni_range = {
+ .max = VXLAN_N_VID - 1,
+};
+
static const struct nla_policy vni_filter_entry_policy[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_MAX + 1] = {
- [VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_START] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
- [VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_END] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
+ [VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_START] = NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE(NLA_U32,
+ &vni_filter_vni_range),
+ [VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_END] = NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE(NLA_U32,
+ &vni_filter_vni_range),
[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_GROUP] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof_field(struct iphdr, daddr)),
[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_GROUP6] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct in6_addr)),
};
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 15:46 Ali Firas [this message]
2026-09-05 19:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-05 19:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902154609.594009-1-alishmery18@gmail.com \
--to=alishmery18@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®