mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] fanotify: destroy/add race leaves a mark on a detached connector
Date: Thu,  3 Sep 2026 06:50:45 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902215046.1149198-1-4ncienth@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjwGdKhX423KoFxW+T5hc9uzCWSsGwn0-QX=CJipPSaYQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 919 bytes --]

Hi Amir,

I was able to make the handle-reopen sequence reliable on ext4 and drafted
an LTP test for it.

The test keeps 120 auxiliary inode marks on the victim to widen the interval
after the first FAN_DELETE_SELF, pins the unlink and handle-reopen workers to
different CPUs, and has the reopen worker read the event queue nonblocking
before calling open_by_handle_at().

I ran the exact final test for 100 iterations in each of two fresh 2-vCPU
KASAN boots per kernel:

  - unmodified v7.2: 200/200 iterations reopened the unlinked inode, and
    closing the reopened fd generated a second FAN_DELETE_SELF;
  - v7.2 with your patch: 200/200 iterations returned ESTALE from
    open_by_handle_at(), with no duplicate FAN_DELETE_SELF.

The test is based on LTP master commit
12724413534a6d4160ff9694ba6f09daa4ccb6bd. The attached patch adds
fanotify26 and the corresponding build and runtest entries.

Thanks,
Daehyeon

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-fanotify-test-duplicate-FAN_DELETE_SELF-after-handle.patch --]
[-- Type: application/x-patch, Size: 11025 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-27  4:50 Daehyeon Ko
2026-08-27 12:45 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-08-27 16:30 ` Jan Kara
2026-08-28  4:24   ` Daehyeon Ko
2026-08-28  9:05     ` Jan Kara
2026-08-28 10:18       ` Amir Goldstein
2026-08-28 17:36         ` Jan Kara
2026-08-29 15:04           ` Amir Goldstein
2026-08-31 11:39             ` Jan Kara
2026-08-31 14:54               ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-01 16:57                 ` Jan Kara
2026-09-01 21:53                   ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-02  7:03                     ` Daehyeon Ko
2026-09-02  7:58                       ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-02 21:50                         ` Daehyeon Ko [this message]
2026-09-03 13:07                           ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-02 16:52                     ` Jan Kara
2026-09-02 17:08                       ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260902215046.1149198-1-4ncienth@gmail.com \
    --to=4ncienth@gmail.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®