From: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] fanotify: destroy/add race leaves a mark on a detached connector
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 06:50:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902215046.1149198-1-4ncienth@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjwGdKhX423KoFxW+T5hc9uzCWSsGwn0-QX=CJipPSaYQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 919 bytes --]
Hi Amir,
I was able to make the handle-reopen sequence reliable on ext4 and drafted
an LTP test for it.
The test keeps 120 auxiliary inode marks on the victim to widen the interval
after the first FAN_DELETE_SELF, pins the unlink and handle-reopen workers to
different CPUs, and has the reopen worker read the event queue nonblocking
before calling open_by_handle_at().
I ran the exact final test for 100 iterations in each of two fresh 2-vCPU
KASAN boots per kernel:
- unmodified v7.2: 200/200 iterations reopened the unlinked inode, and
closing the reopened fd generated a second FAN_DELETE_SELF;
- v7.2 with your patch: 200/200 iterations returned ESTALE from
open_by_handle_at(), with no duplicate FAN_DELETE_SELF.
The test is based on LTP master commit
12724413534a6d4160ff9694ba6f09daa4ccb6bd. The attached patch adds
fanotify26 and the corresponding build and runtest entries.
Thanks,
Daehyeon
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-fanotify-test-duplicate-FAN_DELETE_SELF-after-handle.patch --]
[-- Type: application/x-patch, Size: 11025 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 4:50 Daehyeon Ko
2026-08-27 12:45 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-08-27 16:30 ` Jan Kara
2026-08-28 4:24 ` Daehyeon Ko
2026-08-28 9:05 ` Jan Kara
2026-08-28 10:18 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-08-28 17:36 ` Jan Kara
2026-08-29 15:04 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-08-31 11:39 ` Jan Kara
2026-08-31 14:54 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-01 16:57 ` Jan Kara
2026-09-01 21:53 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-02 7:03 ` Daehyeon Ko
2026-09-02 7:58 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-02 21:50 ` Daehyeon Ko [this message]
2026-09-03 13:07 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-02 16:52 ` Jan Kara
2026-09-02 17:08 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902215046.1149198-1-4ncienth@gmail.com \
--to=4ncienth@gmail.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®