From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] workqueue: Make WQ_UNBOUND the default behavior
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 18:52:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903165251.481362-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
Hi,
Currently alloc_workqueue() make sure one among WQ_UNBOUND or WQ_PERCPU is
present. This is enforced warning and setting WQ_PERCPU as default when
alloc_workqueue() without WQ_PERCPU or WQ_UNBOUND.
[ P1 ] change this behavior: if no flags are specified, WQ_UNBOUND is
set by default, changing the default behavior when flags are not present.
The WARN_ONCE() when neither flags are present has been removed and it has
been replaced by pr_warn_once(): from now on, every alloc_users()
without WQ_PERCPU will be considered unbound.
Q: I decided to pr_warn_once() just to make sure users are aware of the new
behavior. It makes sense or we can just drop it directly?
I don't think the WARN_ONCE() is appropriate now, for this specific path.
[ P2 ] updates the documentation accordingly.
Thanks!
---
Changes in v1:
- if/else to add/drop WQ_UNBOUND/WQ_PERCPU moved before wq_size assignment
Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260903152204.401638-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com/
Marco Crivellari (2):
workqueue: Make alloc_workqueue() unbound by default
doc: Update WQ_UNBOUND documentation
Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst | 2 ++
kernel/workqueue.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
2.55.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 16:52 Marco Crivellari [this message]
2026-09-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] workqueue: Make alloc_workqueue() unbound by default Marco Crivellari
2026-09-03 18:42 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-04 8:24 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-09-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] doc: Update WQ_UNBOUND documentation Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903165251.481362-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®