From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] compiler-gcc: Remove obsolete RELOC_HIDE() macro
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 10:25:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904082741.578048-3-ubizjak@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904082741.578048-1-ubizjak@gmail.com>
Remove the RELOC_HIDE() macro from include/linux/compiler-gcc.h.
The GCC specific macro was historically used to workaround very
old compiler bugs (including pre-4.1 ppc64 GCC). These compilers
are now long obsolete.
Use the generic RELOC_HIDE() macro instead.
Removing the GCC specific macro allows the compiler to better
optimize the code and results in the following code size
reduction for an x86_64 defconfig 7.3-rc1 build:
text data bss dec hex filename
29826466 4953091 743828 35523385 21e0b39 vmlinux-ref.o
29821414 4952963 743828 35518205 21df6fd vmlinux-new.o
Removing the GCC specific macro also enables the compiler
to better analyze the code and avoids suppresion of warnings.
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 25 -------------------------
include/linux/compiler.h | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
index 5de824a0b3d7..081e658754b9 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
@@ -10,31 +10,6 @@
+ __GNUC_MINOR__ * 100 \
+ __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__)
-/*
- * This macro obfuscates arithmetic on a variable address so that gcc
- * shouldn't recognize the original var, and make assumptions about it.
- *
- * This is needed because the C standard makes it undefined to do
- * pointer arithmetic on "objects" outside their boundaries and the
- * gcc optimizers assume this is the case. In particular they
- * assume such arithmetic does not wrap.
- *
- * A miscompilation has been observed because of this on PPC.
- * To work around it we hide the relationship of the pointer and the object
- * using this macro.
- *
- * Versions of the ppc64 compiler before 4.1 had a bug where use of
- * RELOC_HIDE could trash r30. The bug can be worked around by changing
- * the inline assembly constraint from =g to =r, in this particular
- * case either is valid.
- */
-#define RELOC_HIDE(ptr, off) \
-({ \
- unsigned long __ptr; \
- __asm__ ("" : "=r"(__ptr) : "0"(ptr)); \
- (typeof(ptr)) (__ptr + (off)); \
-})
-
#if defined(LATENT_ENTROPY_PLUGIN) && !defined(__CHECKER__)
#define __latent_entropy __attribute__((latent_entropy))
#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index cb2f6050bdf7..a44a88236f6c 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -148,6 +148,14 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val,
= (unsigned long)&sym;
#endif
+/*
+ * This macro obfuscates arithmetic on a variable address so that the compiler
+ * shouldn't recognize the original var, and make assumptions about it.
+ *
+ * This is needed because the C standard makes it undefined to do pointer
+ * arithmetic on "objects" outside their boundaries and compilers assume
+ * this is the case. In particular they assume such arithmetic does not wrap.
+ */
#ifndef RELOC_HIDE
# define RELOC_HIDE(ptr, off) ((typeof(ptr))((unsigned long)(ptr) + (off)))
#endif
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 8:25 [PATCH v2 0/2] Remove obsolete RELOC_HIDE() macro from compiler-gcc.h Uros Bizjak
2026-09-04 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/boot: Disable GCC min-pagesize assumption in boot code Uros Bizjak
2026-09-04 13:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-09-04 8:25 ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2026-09-04 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] compiler-gcc: Remove obsolete RELOC_HIDE() macro Linus Torvalds
2026-09-04 15:29 ` Uros Bizjak
2026-09-04 15:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-09-05 9:42 ` Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904082741.578048-3-ubizjak@gmail.com \
--to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®