From: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Chen Linxuan <me@black-desk.cn>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Matt Harvey <mharvey@jumptrading.com>,
kernel-dev@igalia.com, Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 1/8] Documentation: fuse: add document on caches being used by FUSE
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 11:39:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904103920.4471-2-luis@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904103920.4471-1-luis@igalia.com>
This new file aims at documenting the caches that are used by FUSE. At
the moment only symlink, attributes, ACLs and readdir caches are described.
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com>
---
.../filesystems/fuse/fuse-caches.rst | 158 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 158 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/filesystems/fuse/fuse-caches.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/fuse/fuse-caches.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/fuse/fuse-caches.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e9f60355d7ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/fuse/fuse-caches.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+===========
+FUSE Caches
+===========
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+This document summarises the different types of caches used in FUSE. For each
+cache type, it documents the rules to insert data into it. It also documents the
+rules for validating and invalidating data in the cache.
+
+symlink caching
+===============
+
+Whenever there's a link resolution request for a FUSE filesystem, the VFS will
+call into ``fuse_get_link()``, the ``->get_link()`` inode operation. This
+function will then send a ``FUSE_READLINK`` request to the user-space FUSE
+server.
+
+The server can ask the kernel to cache all link resolutions by setting the
+``FUSE_CACHE_SYMLINKS`` flag during the ``FUSE_INIT`` negotiation. If this flag
+is set, when the VFS calls into the ``->get_link()`` operation, FUSE will
+immediately call ``__page_get_link()``. The first time this is done for a
+specific inode, it will result in sending the ``FUSE_READLINK`` request to
+user-space. But the result returned from this request will then be added into
+the page-cache. The next time this link needs to be resolved, it will use the
+link resolution already cached, and will only fallback to user-space if the
+folio isn't up-to-date.
+
+Attributes caching
+==================
+
+Inode attributes may be obtained from user-space by different FUSE operations.
+For example, ``FUSE_LOOKUP``, ``FUSE_GETATTR``, and also several other
+operations that create file system objects (e.g. ``FUSE_MKDIR``). These
+attributes obtained from user-space are cached by the kernel. They have,
+however, a timeout associated and once it expires, they are invalidated. The
+next time the attributes are needed, a request (``FUSE_GETATTR``) will be sent
+to the FUSE server.
+
+The ``FUSE_GETATTR`` request can be sent to user-space in three different
+scenarios:
+
+#. if the attributes for the inode aren't yet available in the kernel;
+#. if they are not valid any more (timed-out, or have been invalidated), or
+#. if there is an explicit request for forcing the request to be sent (for
+ example, by using the ``AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC`` flag in ``statx``).
+
+Regarding the attributes invalidation, they may happen in several occasions:
+
+- Upon user-space request for invalidation:
+
+ - A ``FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_INODE`` will invalidate ``STATX_BASIC_STATS``;
+ - ``FUSE_NOTIFY_DELETE`` and ``FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_ENTRY`` invalidate
+ ``FUSE_STATX_MODDIR``.
+
+- When setting (or removing) an ACL on an inode ``STATX_CTIME`` is invalidated;
+ if the ``FUSE_POSIX_ACL`` flag was set by the FUSE server,
+ ``STATX_BASIC_STATS`` will also be invalidated.
+- On a ``->rename()`` operation, both the old and the new entities will have
+ it's ctime invalidated (``STATX_CTIME``). Also, the directories for both the
+ old and the new entities will also have their attributes invalidated
+ (``FUSE_STATX_MODDIR``)
+- When creating or deleting a new file system object (``->link()/->unlink()``,
+ ``->symlink()``, ``->mkdir()/->rmdir()``, ``->tmpfile()``, or
+ ``->atomic_open()``), the directory where the object is created/deleted will
+ have it's attributes invalidated (``FUSE_STATX_MODDIR``).
+- If a ``->link()`` operation is interrupted by a signal (``EINTR``) the inode
+ being linked will have it's attributes invalidated (``STATX_BASIC_STATS``).
+- When doing a readdir (``->iterate_shared()`` operation) and the directory
+ contents is not cached, ``STATX_ATIME`` attributes will be invalidated.
+- When doing a symlink resolution (by sending a ``FUSE_READLINK`` request)
+ ``STATX_ATIME`` will be invalidated.
+- When doing a ``->flush()`` (i.e. sending a ``FUSE_FLUSH`` request) and
+ writeback cache is enabled, ``STATX_BLOCKS`` will be invalidated.
+- When truncating a file on open using ``O_TRUNC`` open flag (and the FUSE
+ server has set ``FUSE_ATOMIC_O_TRUNC`` during ``FUSE_INIT``), then
+ ``FUSE_STATX_MODSIZE`` will be invalidated.
+- When setting attributes in an inode (``->setattr()``) and there's a signal
+ that interrupts the operation (``EINTR``), then ``STATX_BASIC_STATS`` will be
+ invalidated.
+- When data is read from a file, ``STATX_ATIME`` will be invalidated (unless the
+ file system is read-only).
+- When data is written info a file, ``FUSE_STATX_MODSIZE`` is invalidated.
+
+ACL caching
+===========
+
+FUSE has allowed the usage of POSIX Access Control Lists (ACLs) for a long time,
+as they can be set and accessed simply as extended attributes. However, it was
+only with the introduction of the ``FUSE_POSIX_ACL`` flag that ACLs started to
+be fully supported. Without this flag being set during the ``FUSE_INIT``
+negotiation, ACLs can still be set, but the VFS won't use them for performing
+permission checks - that would be the user-space server's responsibility.
+
+Also, without setting ``FUSE_POSIX_ACL``, ACLs will not be cached by the kernel.
+In this case, new inodes ``i_acl`` and ``i_default_acl`` fields will be set to
+``ACL_DONT_CACHE``.
+
+On the other hand, if the ``FUSE_POSIX_ACL`` flag is set then, when an inode ACL
+is accessed, VFS will first check if it's already cached. If it is not, FUSE
+``->get_acl()`` operation (``fuse_get_acl()``) is called, which will eventually
+send a user-space request. Future accesses to this inode ACL will use the cached
+data.
+
+Setting an ACL in an inode will also result in sending a request to the FUSE
+server for setting it. But this operation won't immediately cache the ACL -- it
+will only be cached after it is accessed again and requested from user-space.
+
+On the other hand, ACLs will be removed from the cache in the following
+situations:
+
+- When setting an ACL in an inode (and the ``FUSE_POSIX_ACL`` flag is set),
+ previously cached ACLs for this inode will be invalidated.
+- When invalidating an inode through the ``FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_INODE`` operation.
+- When ``->d_revalidate()`` is called for a dentry that requires a lookup (e.g.
+ it has expired) and that lookup operation is successful.
+- When the VFS needs to check access rights for an inode (by calling
+ ``->permission()``), attributes may need to be refreshed. If that happens, any
+ cached ACLs for that inode will be invalidated.
+- After setting an inode attribute (i.e. operation ``FUSE_SETATTR`` is sent to
+ user-space), the user-space server may have also updated the ACLs. Thus, any
+ cached ACLs for this inode are also invalidated.
+- While processing ``FUSE_READDIRPLUS`` and an already existing dentry needs to
+ be updated.
+- In general, when there is the need to send a ``FUSE_STATX`` or
+ ``FUSE_GETATTR`` to user-space (e.g. when attributes expired).
+
+readdir caching
+===============
+
+When opening a directory a ``FUSE_OPENDIR`` will be sent to the FUSE server, and
+server will be responsible for setting the open flags related with caching,
+namely ``FOPEN_KEEP_CACHE`` and ``FOPEN_CACHE_DIR``.
+
+If neither flags are set by the user-space FUSE server, then every ``readdir``
+will result in a ``FUSE_READDIR`` (or ``FUSE_READDIRPLUS``) request being sent.
+If ``FOPEN_CACHE_DIR`` is set by the server, then the result of a ``readdir``
+will be cached by the kernel and reused for the current open. If
+``FOPEN_KEEP_CACHE`` is also set, the cache will be kept and reused in the
+future, when the directory is open again for reading.
+
+The readdir cache will also expire and reset if the inode's ``mtime`` or
+``iversion`` don't match the cached values, or if the FUSE connection ``epoch``
+doesn't match the cache ``epoch``.
+
+dentry caching
+==============
+
+TBD
+
+data caching
+============
+
+TBD
+
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 10:39 [RFC PATCH v3 0/8] fuse: caches documentation and testing Luis Henriques
2026-09-04 10:39 ` Luis Henriques [this message]
2026-09-04 10:39 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/8] selftests/fuse: convert fusectl test to fuse3 Luis Henriques
2026-09-04 10:39 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/8] selftests/fuse: check that fusectlfs is mounted Luis Henriques
2026-09-05 13:59 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-04 10:39 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/8] selftests/fuse: factor-out test fixture setup/teardown Luis Henriques
2026-09-05 12:45 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-04 10:39 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/8] selftests/fuse: use dynamically allocated memory to store ACLs Luis Henriques
2026-09-05 14:00 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-04 10:39 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/8] selftests/fuse: add some extra ACL caching tests Luis Henriques
2026-09-05 12:38 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-04 10:39 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/8] selftests/fuse: add fuse symlink caching test Luis Henriques
2026-09-05 12:32 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-04 10:39 ` [RFC PATCH v3 8/8] selftests/fuse: add fuse readdir " Luis Henriques
2026-09-05 14:11 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904103920.4471-2-luis@igalia.com \
--to=luis@igalia.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@black-desk.cn \
--cc=mharvey@jumptrading.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®