mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bo Zhang <zhangbo0325@gmail.com>
To: aliceryhl@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, cmllamas@google.com
Cc: arve@android.com, tkjos@android.com, christian@brauner.io,
	surenb@google.com, baohua@kernel.org, zhanghongru06@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] binder: switch alloc->mutex to spinlock for buffer metadata
Date: Fri,  4 Sep 2026 19:04:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904110448.23086-2-zhangbo0325@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904110448.23086-1-zhangbo0325@gmail.com>

From: Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>

The alloc->mutex is a highly contended lock on Android devices. When a
low-priority task holds this mutex and sleeps, high-priority binder
transactions are blocked, causing priority inversion and latency spikes.

Split the lock by converting alloc->mutex to a spinlock that only
protects buffer metadata. This eliminates the sleeping and priority
inversion on the hot path.

Page installation and shrinker zap serialization is handled separately
by a dedicated install_mutex introduced in the next patch.

Performance (binderThroughputTest, SM8850, 2 workers, 10 runs):

                    mutex               spinlock
  throughput:    27k-59k iter/s       79k-84k iter/s
  average:       0.031-0.068ms        0.022-0.023ms
  P99:           0.088-0.148ms        0.050-0.062ms

Signed-off-by: Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>
---
 drivers/android/binder_alloc.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
 drivers/android/binder_alloc.h |  8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c b/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c
index e4488ad86a65..9775df3616aa 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static struct binder_buffer *binder_alloc_prepare_to_free_locked(
 struct binder_buffer *binder_alloc_prepare_to_free(struct binder_alloc *alloc,
 						   unsigned long user_ptr)
 {
-	guard(mutex)(&alloc->mutex);
+	guard(spinlock)(&alloc->lock);
 	return binder_alloc_prepare_to_free_locked(alloc, user_ptr);
 }
 
@@ -676,10 +676,10 @@ struct binder_buffer *binder_alloc_new_buf(struct binder_alloc *alloc,
 	if (!next)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-	mutex_lock(&alloc->mutex);
+	spin_lock(&alloc->lock);
 	buffer = binder_alloc_new_buf_locked(alloc, next, size, is_async);
 	if (IS_ERR(buffer)) {
-		mutex_unlock(&alloc->mutex);
+		spin_unlock(&alloc->lock);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ struct binder_buffer *binder_alloc_new_buf(struct binder_alloc *alloc,
 	buffer->offsets_size = offsets_size;
 	buffer->extra_buffers_size = extra_buffers_size;
 	buffer->pid = current->tgid;
-	mutex_unlock(&alloc->mutex);
+	spin_unlock(&alloc->lock);
 
 	ret = binder_install_buffer_pages(alloc, buffer, size);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -872,9 +872,9 @@ void binder_alloc_free_buf(struct binder_alloc *alloc,
 		binder_alloc_clear_buf(alloc, buffer);
 		buffer->clear_on_free = false;
 	}
-	mutex_lock(&alloc->mutex);
+	spin_lock(&alloc->lock);
 	binder_free_buf_locked(alloc, buffer);
-	mutex_unlock(&alloc->mutex);
+	spin_unlock(&alloc->lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(binder_alloc_free_buf);
 
@@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ void binder_alloc_deferred_release(struct binder_alloc *alloc)
 	struct binder_buffer *buffer;
 
 	buffers = 0;
-	mutex_lock(&alloc->mutex);
+	spin_lock(&alloc->lock);
 	BUG_ON(alloc->mapped);
 
 	while ((n = rb_first(&alloc->allocated_buffers))) {
@@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ void binder_alloc_deferred_release(struct binder_alloc *alloc)
 			page_count++;
 		}
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&alloc->mutex);
+	spin_unlock(&alloc->lock);
 	kvfree(alloc->pages);
 	if (alloc->mm)
 		mmdrop(alloc->mm);
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ void binder_alloc_print_allocated(struct seq_file *m,
 	struct binder_buffer *buffer;
 	struct rb_node *n;
 
-	guard(mutex)(&alloc->mutex);
+	guard(spinlock)(&alloc->lock);
 	for (n = rb_first(&alloc->allocated_buffers); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
 		buffer = rb_entry(n, struct binder_buffer, rb_node);
 		seq_printf(m, "  buffer %d: %lx size %zd:%zd:%zd %s\n",
@@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ void binder_alloc_print_pages(struct seq_file *m,
 	int lru = 0;
 	int free = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&alloc->mutex);
+	spin_lock(&alloc->lock);
 	/*
 	 * Make sure the binder_alloc is fully initialized, otherwise we might
 	 * read inconsistent state.
@@ -1085,7 +1085,7 @@ void binder_alloc_print_pages(struct seq_file *m,
 				lru++;
 		}
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&alloc->mutex);
+	spin_unlock(&alloc->lock);
 	seq_printf(m, "  pages: %d:%d:%d\n", active, lru, free);
 	seq_printf(m, "  pages high watermark: %zu\n", alloc->pages_high);
 }
@@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ int binder_alloc_get_allocated_count(struct binder_alloc *alloc)
 	struct rb_node *n;
 	int count = 0;
 
-	guard(mutex)(&alloc->mutex);
+	guard(spinlock)(&alloc->lock);
 	for (n = rb_first(&alloc->allocated_buffers); n != NULL; n = rb_next(n))
 		count++;
 	return count;
@@ -1161,8 +1161,8 @@ enum lru_status binder_alloc_free_page(struct list_head *item,
 		vma = vma_lookup(mm, page_addr);
 	}
 
-	if (!mutex_trylock(&alloc->mutex))
-		goto err_get_alloc_mutex_failed;
+	if (!spin_trylock(&alloc->lock))
+		goto err_get_alloc_lock_failed;
 
 	/*
 	 * Since a binder_alloc can only be mapped once, we ensure
@@ -1180,6 +1180,7 @@ enum lru_status binder_alloc_free_page(struct list_head *item,
 	trace_binder_unmap_kernel_end(alloc, index);
 
 	list_lru_isolate(lru, item);
+	spin_unlock(&alloc->lock);
 	spin_unlock(&lru->lock);
 
 	if (vma) {
@@ -1190,7 +1191,6 @@ enum lru_status binder_alloc_free_page(struct list_head *item,
 		trace_binder_unmap_user_end(alloc, index);
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&alloc->mutex);
 	if (mm_locked)
 		mmap_read_unlock(mm);
 	else
@@ -1201,8 +1201,8 @@ enum lru_status binder_alloc_free_page(struct list_head *item,
 	return LRU_REMOVED_RETRY;
 
 err_invalid_vma:
-	mutex_unlock(&alloc->mutex);
-err_get_alloc_mutex_failed:
+	spin_unlock(&alloc->lock);
+err_get_alloc_lock_failed:
 	if (mm_locked)
 		mmap_read_unlock(mm);
 	else
@@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT void __binder_alloc_init(struct binder_alloc *alloc,
 	alloc->pid = current->tgid;
 	alloc->mm = current->mm;
 	mmgrab(alloc->mm);
-	mutex_init(&alloc->mutex);
+	spin_lock_init(&alloc->lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&alloc->buffers);
 	alloc->freelist = freelist;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/android/binder_alloc.h b/drivers/android/binder_alloc.h
index d6f1f6f2d00e..bea5a77bb6da 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder_alloc.h
+++ b/drivers/android/binder_alloc.h
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 #include <linux/rbtree.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
-#include <linux/rtmutex.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/list_lru.h>
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static inline struct list_head *page_to_lru(struct page *p)
 
 /**
  * struct binder_alloc - per-binder proc state for binder allocator
- * @mutex:              protects binder_alloc fields
+ * @lock:               protects binder_alloc fields
  * @mm:                 copy of task->mm (invariant after open)
  * @vm_start:           base of per-proc address space mapped via mmap
  * @buffers:            list of all buffers for this proc
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static inline struct list_head *page_to_lru(struct page *p)
  * struct binder_buffer objects used to track the user buffers
  */
 struct binder_alloc {
-	struct mutex mutex;
+	spinlock_t lock;
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
 	unsigned long vm_start;
 	struct list_head buffers;
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ void binder_alloc_print_pages(struct seq_file *m,
 static inline size_t
 binder_alloc_get_free_async_space(struct binder_alloc *alloc)
 {
-	guard(mutex)(&alloc->mutex);
+	guard(spinlock)(&alloc->lock);
 	return alloc->free_async_space;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-04 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04 11:04 [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] binder: split alloc->mutex to improve performance Bo Zhang
2026-09-04 11:04 ` Bo Zhang [this message]
2026-09-04 11:04 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] binder: add install_mutex to serialize page install and shrinker zap Bo Zhang
2026-09-04 16:19   ` Bo Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260904110448.23086-2-zhangbo0325@gmail.com \
    --to=zhangbo0325@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhanghongru06@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®