mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
To: Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] tracing/user_events: Don't destroy fields when event removal fails
Date: Fri,  4 Sep 2026 19:52:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904115223.2976446-1-bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903182903.GA62-beaub@linux.microsoft.com>

destroy_user_event() destroys the event's fields before attempting to
remove the trace event call. If user_event_set_call_visible() fails,
e.g. because the event is still enabled and trace_remove_event_call()
returns -EBUSY, the event is left registered with an irreversibly
destroyed field list. Any subsequent interaction with the event then
operates on an empty field list while it is still fully visible in
tracefs.

Move the field destruction after the call removal, and splice the
field list back onto the event when the removal fails so the event
remains in a consistent state.

Fixes: 7f5a08c79df35 ("user_events: Add minimal support for trace_event into ftrace")
Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
---
v2:
 - Restore the comment on detaching the fields before removal: removing
   the event frees the field list memory, which is allocated and owned
   by user_events (Beau).
 - Comment why the fields are spliced back onto the event when removal
   fails: the event stays registered and the fields must be recovered
   (Beau).

 kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
index 93cda2f6f2692..f658c3a77aa7a 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
@@ -1122,10 +1122,9 @@ static void user_event_destroy_validators(struct user_event *user)
 	}
 }
 
-static void user_event_destroy_fields(struct user_event *user)
+static void user_event_destroy_fields(struct list_head *head)
 {
 	struct ftrace_event_field *field, *next;
-	struct list_head *head = &user->fields;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(field, next, head, link) {
 		list_del(&field->link);
@@ -1502,17 +1501,32 @@ static int user_event_set_call_visible(struct user_event *user, bool visible)
 
 static int destroy_user_event(struct user_event *user)
 {
+	LIST_HEAD(fields);
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&event_mutex);
 
-	/* Must destroy fields before call removal */
-	user_event_destroy_fields(user);
+	/*
+	 * Detach the fields before removing the call. Removing the event
+	 * frees the field list memory (trace_destroy_fields() is run on
+	 * successful removal and kmem_cache_free()s the fields), but the
+	 * fields here are allocated and owned by user_events. Destroy
+	 * them separately once removal has succeeded.
+	 */
+	list_splice_init(&user->fields, &fields);
 
 	ret = user_event_set_call_visible(user, false);
 
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
+		/*
+		 * Removal failed and the event stays registered, recover
+		 * the fields so it is left in a consistent state.
+		 */
+		list_splice(&fields, &user->fields);
 		return ret;
+	}
+
+	user_event_destroy_fields(&fields);
 
 	dyn_event_remove(&user->devent);
 	hash_del(&user->node);
@@ -2212,7 +2226,7 @@ static int user_event_parse(struct user_event_group *group, char *name,
 put_user_lock:
 	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
 put_user:
-	user_event_destroy_fields(user);
+	user_event_destroy_fields(&user->fields);
 	user_event_destroy_validators(user);
 	kfree(user->call.print_fmt);
 
-- 
2.43.0

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-04 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-24 10:29 [PATCH] " Henry Martin
2026-08-24 20:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-09-03 18:29   ` Beau Belgrave
2026-09-04 11:52     ` Henry Martin [this message]
2026-09-07 16:45       ` [PATCH v2] " Beau Belgrave

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260904115223.2976446-1-bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com \
    --to=bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com \
    --cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®