From: NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/7] VFS: enhance d_splice_alias() to handle hashed dentries
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2026 07:48:11 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904215142.1060510-3-neilb@ownmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904215142.1060510-1-neilb@ownmail.net>
From: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
We currently have three interfaces for attaching existing inodes to
normal filesystems(*).
- d_add() requires an unhashed or in-lookup dentry and doesn't handle
splicing in case a directory already has dentry
- d_instantiate() requires a hashed dentry, and also doesn't handle
splicing.
- d_splice_alias() requires unhashed or in-lookup and does handle
splicing, and can return an alternate dentry.
So there is no interface that supports both hashed and in-lookup, which
is what ->atomic_open needs to deal with.
Some filesystems check for in-lookup in their atomic_open and if found,
perform a ->lookup and can subsequently use d_instantiate() if the
dentry is still negative. Others d_drop() the dentry so they can use
d_splice_alias().
This last will cause a problem for proposed changes to locking which
require the dentry to remain hashed while an operation proceeds on it.
There is also no interface which splices a directory (which might
already have a dentry) to a hashed dentry. Filesystems which need to do
this d_drop() first.
Some filesystems (NFS) skip ->lookup processing for
LOOKUP_CREATE|LOOKUP_EXCL
which includes mknod, link, symlink etc. So these inode operations
might get an unhashed or a hashed-negative dentry. There is no
interface for instantiating these so again they need to unhash
first (nfs_link)
So with this patch d_splice_alias() can handle hashed, unhashed, or
in-lookup dentries. This makes it suitable for ->lookup, ->atomic_open,
and ->mkdir as well as others.
As a side effect d_add() will also now handle hashed dentries, but
I have plans to remove d_add() as there is no benefit having it as
well as the others.
Once updated to handle nr_dentry_negative as is required for hashed
dentrties, __d_add() contains code that is identical to
__d_instantiate(), so the former is changed to call the later so now:
- d_add() calls __d_add() which hashes and might call __d_instantiate.
- d_instantiate() calls __d_instantiate() with appropriate locks.
It was suggested by Al Viro
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250813050717.GD222315@ZenIV/
that rather than allow d_splice_alias() to handle both hashed and
unhashed, we should have a new d_splice_alias_hashed().
I chose not to follow this path because, as noted above, there
are several cases where the filesystem has no a priori knowledge
of the state of the dentry, and so would need
if (d_unhashed(dentry))
alias = d_splice_alias(inode, dentry);
else
alias = d_splice_alias_hashed(inode, dentry);
which is clumsy.
Also I hope to minimise the distinction between hashed and in-lookup
(they will both be hashed, just with different DCACHE_ENTRY_TYPE)
and reduce the use of unhashed dentries.
Unhashed dentries would only be created by d_alloc_name() and all
of those are passed to d_make_persistent() (though configfs passes
some to d_add(dentry, NULL) first!). So the use-case for
d_splice_alias() on unhashed dentries would disappear.
Note that d_make_persistent() already handles both hashed and
unhashed dentries - just not in-lookup.
* There is also d_make_persistent() for filesystems which are
dcache-based and don't support mkdir, create etc, and
d_instantiate_new() for newly created inodes that are still locked.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
---
Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst | 4 ++--
fs/dcache.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
index d3a93eec3945..de8f8502056e 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
@@ -507,8 +507,8 @@ otherwise noted.
dentry before the first mkdir returns.
If there is any chance this could happen, then the new inode
- should be d_drop()ed and attached with d_splice_alias(). The
- returned dentry (if any) should be returned by ->mkdir().
+ should be attached with d_splice_alias(). The returned
+ dentry (if any) should be returned by ->mkdir().
``rmdir``
called by the rmdir(2) system call. Only required if you want
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 1b1a81f10da6..fd74753e7715 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -2168,7 +2168,6 @@ static void __d_instantiate(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
* (or otherwise set) by the caller to indicate that it is now
* in use by the dcache.
*/
-
void d_instantiate(struct dentry *entry, struct inode * inode)
{
BUG_ON(d_really_is_positive(entry));
@@ -2931,15 +2930,10 @@ static inline void __d_add(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
}
if (unlikely(ops))
d_set_d_op(dentry, ops);
- if (inode) {
- unsigned add_flags = d_flags_for_inode(inode);
- hlist_add_head(&dentry->d_alias, &inode->i_dentry);
- raw_write_seqcount_begin(&dentry->d_seq);
- __d_set_inode_and_type(dentry, inode, add_flags);
- raw_write_seqcount_end(&dentry->d_seq);
- fsnotify_update_flags(dentry);
- }
- __d_rehash(dentry);
+ if (inode)
+ __d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
+ if (d_unhashed(dentry))
+ __d_rehash(dentry);
if (dir) {
end_dir_add(dir, n);
__d_wake_in_lookup_waiters(dentry);
@@ -3241,7 +3235,7 @@ struct dentry *d_splice_alias_ops(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry,
if (IS_ERR(inode))
return ERR_CAST(inode);
- BUG_ON(!d_unhashed(dentry));
+ BUG_ON(d_really_is_positive(dentry));
if (!inode)
goto out;
@@ -3297,6 +3291,8 @@ struct dentry *d_splice_alias_ops(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry,
* @inode: the inode which may have a disconnected dentry
* @dentry: a negative dentry which we want to point to the inode.
*
+ * @dentry must be negative and may be in-lookup or unhashed or hashed.
+ *
* If inode is a directory and has an IS_ROOT alias, then d_move that in
* place of the given dentry and return it, else simply d_add the inode
* to the dentry and return NULL.
@@ -3304,16 +3300,14 @@ struct dentry *d_splice_alias_ops(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry,
* If a non-IS_ROOT directory is found, the filesystem is corrupt, and
* we should error out: directories can't have multiple aliases.
*
- * This is needed in the lookup routine of any filesystem that is exportable
- * (via knfsd) so that we can build dcache paths to directories effectively.
+ * This should be used to return the result of ->lookup() and to
+ * instantiate the result of ->mkdir(), is often useful for
+ * ->atomic_open, and may be used to instantiate other objects.
*
* If a dentry was found and moved, then it is returned. Otherwise NULL
- * is returned. This matches the expected return value of ->lookup.
+ * is returned. This matches the expected return value of ->lookup and
+ * ->mkdir.
*
- * Cluster filesystems may call this function with a negative, hashed dentry.
- * In that case, we know that the inode will be a regular file, and also this
- * will only occur during atomic_open. So we need to check for the dentry
- * being already hashed only in the final case.
*/
struct dentry *d_splice_alias(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry)
{
--
2.50.0.107.gf914562f5916.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 21:48 [PATCH v4 0/7] VFS: prepare for changes to directory locking NeilBrown
2026-09-04 21:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] VFS: fix various typos in documentation for start_creating start_removing etc NeilBrown
2026-09-04 21:48 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2026-09-04 21:48 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] VFS: introduce d_alloc_trylock() NeilBrown
2026-09-04 21:48 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] VFS: add d_duplicate() NeilBrown
2026-09-04 21:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] VFS: Add LOOKUP_SHARED flag NeilBrown
2026-09-04 21:48 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] VFS: add lockdep monitoring of DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP lock NeilBrown
2026-09-30 16:31 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-09-30 21:08 ` NeilBrown
2026-10-01 10:39 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-09-04 21:48 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] VFS: reserve a d_flags bit for fs-specific usage NeilBrown
2026-09-15 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] VFS: prepare for changes to directory locking NeilBrown
2026-09-25 14:28 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904215142.1060510-3-neilb@ownmail.net \
--to=neilb@ownmail.net \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®