mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/7] VFS: enhance d_splice_alias() to handle hashed dentries
Date: Sat,  5 Sep 2026 07:48:11 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904215142.1060510-3-neilb@ownmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904215142.1060510-1-neilb@ownmail.net>

From: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>

We currently have three interfaces for attaching existing inodes to
normal filesystems(*).
- d_add() requires an unhashed or in-lookup dentry and doesn't handle
  splicing in case a directory already has dentry
- d_instantiate() requires a hashed dentry, and also doesn't handle
  splicing.
- d_splice_alias() requires unhashed or in-lookup and does handle
  splicing, and can return an alternate dentry.

So there is no interface that supports both hashed and in-lookup, which
is what ->atomic_open needs to deal with.

Some filesystems check for in-lookup in their atomic_open and if found,
perform a ->lookup and can subsequently use d_instantiate() if the
dentry is still negative.  Others d_drop() the dentry so they can use
d_splice_alias().

This last will cause a problem for proposed changes to locking which
require the dentry to remain hashed while an operation proceeds on it.

There is also no interface which splices a directory (which might
already have a dentry) to a hashed dentry.  Filesystems which need to do
this d_drop() first.

Some filesystems (NFS) skip ->lookup processing for
  LOOKUP_CREATE|LOOKUP_EXCL
which includes mknod, link, symlink etc.  So these inode operations
might get an unhashed or a hashed-negative dentry.  There is no
interface for instantiating these so again they need to unhash
first (nfs_link)

So with this patch d_splice_alias() can handle hashed, unhashed, or
in-lookup dentries.  This makes it suitable for ->lookup, ->atomic_open,
and ->mkdir as well as others.

As a side effect d_add() will also now handle hashed dentries, but
I have plans to remove d_add() as there is no benefit having it as
well as the others.

Once updated to handle nr_dentry_negative as is required for hashed
dentrties, __d_add() contains code that is identical to
__d_instantiate(), so the former is changed to call the later so now:

- d_add() calls __d_add() which hashes and might call __d_instantiate.
- d_instantiate() calls __d_instantiate() with appropriate locks.

It was suggested by Al Viro
   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250813050717.GD222315@ZenIV/
that rather than allow d_splice_alias() to handle both hashed and
unhashed, we should have a new d_splice_alias_hashed().
I chose not to follow this path because, as noted above, there
are several cases where the filesystem has no a priori knowledge
of the state of the dentry, and so would need
  if (d_unhashed(dentry))
      alias = d_splice_alias(inode, dentry);
  else
      alias = d_splice_alias_hashed(inode, dentry);
which is clumsy.
Also I hope to minimise the distinction between hashed and in-lookup
(they will both be hashed, just with different DCACHE_ENTRY_TYPE)
and reduce the use of unhashed dentries.
Unhashed dentries would only be created by d_alloc_name() and all
of those are passed to d_make_persistent() (though configfs passes
some to d_add(dentry, NULL) first!).  So the use-case for
d_splice_alias() on unhashed dentries would disappear.
Note that d_make_persistent() already handles both hashed and
unhashed dentries - just not in-lookup.

* There is also d_make_persistent() for filesystems which are
  dcache-based and don't support mkdir, create etc, and
  d_instantiate_new() for newly created inodes that are still locked.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst |  4 ++--
 fs/dcache.c                       | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
index d3a93eec3945..de8f8502056e 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
@@ -507,8 +507,8 @@ otherwise noted.
 	dentry before the first mkdir returns.
 
 	If there is any chance this could happen, then the new inode
-	should be d_drop()ed and attached with d_splice_alias().  The
-	returned dentry (if any) should be returned by ->mkdir().
+	should be attached with d_splice_alias().  The returned
+	dentry (if any) should be returned by ->mkdir().
 
 ``rmdir``
 	called by the rmdir(2) system call.  Only required if you want
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 1b1a81f10da6..fd74753e7715 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -2168,7 +2168,6 @@ static void __d_instantiate(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
  * (or otherwise set) by the caller to indicate that it is now
  * in use by the dcache.
  */
- 
 void d_instantiate(struct dentry *entry, struct inode * inode)
 {
 	BUG_ON(d_really_is_positive(entry));
@@ -2931,15 +2930,10 @@ static inline void __d_add(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
 	}
 	if (unlikely(ops))
 		d_set_d_op(dentry, ops);
-	if (inode) {
-		unsigned add_flags = d_flags_for_inode(inode);
-		hlist_add_head(&dentry->d_alias, &inode->i_dentry);
-		raw_write_seqcount_begin(&dentry->d_seq);
-		__d_set_inode_and_type(dentry, inode, add_flags);
-		raw_write_seqcount_end(&dentry->d_seq);
-		fsnotify_update_flags(dentry);
-	}
-	__d_rehash(dentry);
+	if (inode)
+		__d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
+	if (d_unhashed(dentry))
+		__d_rehash(dentry);
 	if (dir) {
 		end_dir_add(dir, n);
 		__d_wake_in_lookup_waiters(dentry);
@@ -3241,7 +3235,7 @@ struct dentry *d_splice_alias_ops(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry,
 	if (IS_ERR(inode))
 		return ERR_CAST(inode);
 
-	BUG_ON(!d_unhashed(dentry));
+	BUG_ON(d_really_is_positive(dentry));
 
 	if (!inode)
 		goto out;
@@ -3297,6 +3291,8 @@ struct dentry *d_splice_alias_ops(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry,
  * @inode:  the inode which may have a disconnected dentry
  * @dentry: a negative dentry which we want to point to the inode.
  *
+ * @dentry must be negative and may be in-lookup or unhashed or hashed.
+ *
  * If inode is a directory and has an IS_ROOT alias, then d_move that in
  * place of the given dentry and return it, else simply d_add the inode
  * to the dentry and return NULL.
@@ -3304,16 +3300,14 @@ struct dentry *d_splice_alias_ops(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry,
  * If a non-IS_ROOT directory is found, the filesystem is corrupt, and
  * we should error out: directories can't have multiple aliases.
  *
- * This is needed in the lookup routine of any filesystem that is exportable
- * (via knfsd) so that we can build dcache paths to directories effectively.
+ * This should be used to return the result of ->lookup() and to
+ * instantiate the result of ->mkdir(), is often useful for
+ * ->atomic_open, and may be used to instantiate other objects.
  *
  * If a dentry was found and moved, then it is returned.  Otherwise NULL
- * is returned.  This matches the expected return value of ->lookup.
+ * is returned.  This matches the expected return value of ->lookup and
+ * ->mkdir.
  *
- * Cluster filesystems may call this function with a negative, hashed dentry.
- * In that case, we know that the inode will be a regular file, and also this
- * will only occur during atomic_open. So we need to check for the dentry
- * being already hashed only in the final case.
  */
 struct dentry *d_splice_alias(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry)
 {
-- 
2.50.0.107.gf914562f5916.dirty


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-04 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04 21:48 [PATCH v4 0/7] VFS: prepare for changes to directory locking NeilBrown
2026-09-04 21:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] VFS: fix various typos in documentation for start_creating start_removing etc NeilBrown
2026-09-04 21:48 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2026-09-04 21:48 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] VFS: introduce d_alloc_trylock() NeilBrown
2026-09-04 21:48 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] VFS: add d_duplicate() NeilBrown
2026-09-04 21:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] VFS: Add LOOKUP_SHARED flag NeilBrown
2026-09-04 21:48 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] VFS: add lockdep monitoring of DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP lock NeilBrown
2026-09-30 16:31   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-09-30 21:08     ` NeilBrown
2026-10-01 10:39       ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-09-04 21:48 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] VFS: reserve a d_flags bit for fs-specific usage NeilBrown
2026-09-15 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] VFS: prepare for changes to directory locking NeilBrown
2026-09-25 14:28 ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260904215142.1060510-3-neilb@ownmail.net \
    --to=neilb@ownmail.net \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®