From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 2/3] tcp: Skip cond_resched() in inet_csk_listen_stop() under BPF context
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2026 15:41:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260906074135.185212-3-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260906074135.185212-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
bpf_sock_destroy() runs from the tcp iterator, under rcu_read_lock(). If
the sock is a listener that still has children in its accept queue,
tcp_abort() ends up in inet_csk_listen_stop() and the cond_resched()
there trips the debug check:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:1523
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 628, name: test_progs
preempt_count: 0, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 0
locks held by test_progs/628: 3, last CPU#3:
#0: ffff8881158cee18 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x56/0x1210
#1: ffff8881106bb858 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_iter_tcp_seq_show+0x32b/0x4b0
#2: ffffffffb435af20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x46b/0xde0
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 628 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G W 7.2.0+ #65 PREEMPT
Tainted: [W]=WARN
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0xc1/0xf0
dump_stack+0x10/0x20
__might_resched+0x3d2/0x610
inet_csk_listen_stop+0x7b/0xbf0
tcp_abort+0x23b/0x3b0
bpf_sock_destroy+0xfc/0x140
bpf_prog_448133d24601754f_iter_tcp6_server+0x81/0x8a
bpf_iter_run_prog+0x538/0xde0
bpf_iter_tcp_seq_show+0x26b/0x4b0
bpf_seq_read+0x424/0x1210
vfs_read+0x197/0xe40
ksys_read+0x119/0x240
__x64_sys_read+0x72/0xc0
x64_sys_call+0x647/0x27e0
do_syscall_64+0xe5/0x610
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7fad39b28aca
RSP: 002b:00007ffc381c61c0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc381c6a88 RCX: 00007fad39b28aca
RDX: 0000000000000032 RSI: 00007ffc381c6250 RDI: 0000000000000014
RBP: 00007ffc381c61e0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055f077c1bbb0 R15: 00007fad3a0f3000
</TASK>
The commit that added the kfunc already guards lock_sock() in tcp_abort()
and udp_abort() with has_current_bpf_ctx(), but missed the listener path.
Do the same for the cond_resched(), it can't reschedule there anyway.
Fixes: 4ddbcb886268 ("bpf: Add bpf_sock_destroy kfunc")
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
---
net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index 6257459bcee2..6a30f1138454 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -1520,7 +1520,8 @@ void inet_csk_listen_stop(struct sock *sk)
local_bh_enable();
sock_put(child);
- cond_resched();
+ if (!has_current_bpf_ctx())
+ cond_resched();
}
if (queue->fastopenq.rskq_rst_head) {
/* Free all the reqs queued in rskq_rst_head. */
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-06 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-06 7:41 [PATCH bpf v2 0/3] bpf,tcp: Fix bpf_sock_destroy() on TIME_WAIT and listener socks Jiayuan Chen
2026-09-06 7:41 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/3] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds read of sk_protocol in bpf_sock_destroy() Jiayuan Chen
2026-09-07 23:23 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-06 7:41 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2026-09-06 8:23 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/3] tcp: Skip cond_resched() in inet_csk_listen_stop() under BPF context bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-07 23:34 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-08 8:07 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-09-08 12:22 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-09-06 7:41 ` [PATCH bpf v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_sock_destroy() on TIME_WAIT and listener socks Jiayuan Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260906074135.185212-3-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=aditi.ghag@isovalent.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®