From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Norbert Szetei <norbert@doyensec.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: Reject prefetch of a non-ODP MR
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2026 12:01:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260906090149.GB13683@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874DA83D-C81E-4858-B9E7-D2A3BFE0137D@doyensec.com>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 09:49:26AM +0200, Norbert Szetei wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2026, at 09:56, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 12:51:20PM +0200, Norbert Szetei wrote:
> >> rxe_ib_advise_mr_prefetch() and rxe_ib_prefetch_sg_list() look up the MR
> >> by lkey and hand it to rxe_odp_do_pagefault_and_lock() without checking
> >> that it is an ODP MR. That path runs to_ib_umem_odp() on mr->umem, and
> >> for a non-ODP MR mr->umem is a plain struct ib_umem from ib_umem_get(),
> >> so the container_of() in to_ib_umem_odp() lands past the end of the
> >> object and ib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock() reads its ib_umem_odp fields
> >> out of bounds.
> >>
> >> lookup_mr() validates the lkey, PD, access and state but not the MR
> >> type, and IB_UVERBS_ADVISE_MR_ADVICE_PREFETCH is accepted for any MR.
> >>
> >> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock+0x884/0x8a0
> >> Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810a3ebcf0 by task advi/921
> >> ib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock+0x884/0x8a0
> >> rxe_ib_advise_mr+0x543/0xad0
> >> ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_ADVISE_MR+0x446/0x530
> >> ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs+0x2b3c/0x3b20
> >> ib_uverbs_ioctl+0x1e3/0x310
> >> Allocated by task 921:
> >> __ib_umem_get_va+0x13e/0xae0
> >> rxe_mr_init_user+0x2ae/0xb00
> >> rxe_reg_user_mr+0x337/0x510
> >> The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88810a3ebc80
> >> which belongs to the cache kmalloc-96 of size 96
> >>
> >> Reject a non-ODP MR after lookup_mr() in both the synchronous and
> >> asynchronous prefetch arms.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 3576b0df1588 ("RDMA/rxe: Implement synchronous prefetch for ODP MRs")
> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Norbert Szetei <norbert@doyensec.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
> >> index e870efa7a0a3..5c9dde3501a0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
> >> @@ -472,6 +472,11 @@ static int rxe_ib_prefetch_sg_list(struct ib_pd *ibpd,
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + if (unlikely(!is_odp_mr(mr))) {
> >> + rxe_put(mr);
> >> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >> + }
> >
> > The idea is correct, but the implementation needs some improvement.
> >
> > RXE stores the access flags in the MR, including IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND,
> > which indicates that the MR was created as an ODP MR. lookup_mr()
> > should check this flag and perform the lookup accordingly.
>
> Do you mean lookup_mr() should take IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND into account, so that
> the existing (access & mr->access) != access test rejects the non-ODP MR?
I expected lookup_mr(..., IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND) to be called and to
perform all the necessary checks internally.
>
> rxe_rereg_user_mr() with IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS assigns mr->access directly, and
> IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND is part of RXE_ACCESS_SUPPORTED_MR. So userspace can set
> that flag on a plain MR after registration, without the umem changing. Am I
> missing something there?
I assume this is a bug that needs to be fixed.
Thanks
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> > Thanks.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-06 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 10:51 Norbert Szetei
2026-08-27 19:12 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-09-01 7:56 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-04 7:49 ` Norbert Szetei
2026-09-06 9:01 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2026-09-13 11:53 ` Norbert Szetei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260906090149.GB13683@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=norbert@doyensec.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®