From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
wei.fang@nxp.com, frank.li@nxp.com, shenwei.wang@nxp.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
swboyd@chromium.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: fec: Propagate PTP initialization errors
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2026 14:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260906131711.247708-1-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904105542.70540-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
Full review at: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904105542.70540-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=1
---
net: fec: Propagate PTP initialization errors
Change fec_ptp_init() to return an error code instead of silently
ignoring failures during PTP initialization.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260903092430.354186-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com/
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> index 794ec427b0ee6..a9a458703547d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -5394,7 +5397,9 @@ fec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> for (i = 0; i < irq_cnt; i++) {
> snprintf(irq_name, sizeof(irq_name), "int%d", i);
> irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, irq_name);
> - if (irq < 0)
> + if (irq < 0 && irq != -ENXIO)
> + return irq;
[Severity: High]
Does this direct return bypass the error handling cleanup at the end of
fec_probe()?
By returning directly instead of jumping to the failed_irq label, the driver
bypasses fec_ptp_stop(). This leaves the fep->time_keep delayed work
(scheduled earlier in fec_ptp_init()) active.
It also bypasses free_netdev(ndev), which leaks the net_device structure.
When the driver core cleans up devres allocations on probe failure, it unmaps
fep->hwp. If the un-canceled delayed work subsequently fires, will it attempt
to access the unmapped memory at fep->hwp and cause a kernel panic?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c
> index 56801c2009d59..557a76797ebaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -779,26 +779,32 @@ void fec_ptp_init(struct platform_device *pdev, int irq_idx)
> HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
>
> irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "pps");
[ ... ]
> + if (irq > 0) {
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, fec_pps_interrupt,
> 0, pdev->name, ndev);
> if (ret < 0)
> - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "request for pps irq failed(%d)\n",
> - ret);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> fep->ptp_clock = ptp_clock_register(&fep->ptp_caps, &pdev->dev);
> if (IS_ERR(fep->ptp_clock)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(fep->ptp_clock);
> fep->ptp_clock = NULL;
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "ptp_clock_register failed\n");
> + return ret;
[Severity: High]
Does this error return leave the devm-managed IRQ active while propagating an
error back to the probe function?
If ptp_clock_register() fails, fec_ptp_init() returns an error which
propagates to fec_probe(), causing it to jump to failed_reset.
The error path in fec_probe() manually frees ndev via free_netdev(ndev).
However, the PPS interrupt was registered just prior using devm_request_irq(),
so it remains active until fec_probe() returns and devres tears it down.
If the PPS interrupt fires between the manual free of ndev and the devres
cleanup, will fec_pps_interrupt() cast dev_id to ndev and attempt to
dereference the already-freed ndev structure, causing a use-after-free crash?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-06 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 10:55 phucduc.bui
2026-09-06 13:17 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-09-07 2:09 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-09-07 2:19 ` Wei Fang
2026-09-07 2:28 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-09-07 15:58 ` Shengzhuo Wei
2026-09-08 1:39 ` Bui Duc Phuc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260906131711.247708-1-horms@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®