From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@locrian.net>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] exec: do_close_on_exec() before taking exec_update_lock
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 23:26:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907-cloexec-before-exec-update-lock-v1-1-8018c201a7df@google.com> (raw)
do_close_on_exec() currently happens while holding the exec_update_lock,
which is used in a lot of places that access process state to
synchronize access checks.
I recently added another such use of exec_update_lock, causing a
regression.
do_close_on_exec() can block waiting for a reply from a filesystem.
That means a hung filesystem can block codepaths that use
exec_update_lock; and it also means that a FUSE filesystem which
attempts to inspect the calling process can deadlock.
To avoid such problems, move do_close_on_exec() before the
exec_update_lock is taken, but after the FD table has been copied if
necessary.
I have looked through all the calls between the old and new position of
the do_close_on_exec() call; there seems to be no file descriptor table
access in between.
Reported-by: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@locrian.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f5e8166a-88be-46c5-8939-1e5227ffe4c2@app.fastmail.com
Fixes: 6650527444da ("proc: protect ptrace_may_access() with exec_update_lock (part 1)")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 745f6eb5279e..b51e5d7e4536 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1164,6 +1164,20 @@ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
if (retval)
goto out;
+ /*
+ * We have to apply CLOEXEC before we change whether the process is
+ * dumpable (in setup_new_exec) to avoid a race with a process in userspace
+ * trying to access the should-be-closed file descriptors of a process
+ * undergoing exec(2).
+ *
+ * This can block on filesystem ->flush() handlers, including waiting
+ * for FUSE daemons, so do it before exec_mmap takes the
+ * exec_update_lock.
+ * This must happen after the point of no return, and after unsharing
+ * the FD table.
+ */
+ do_close_on_exec(me->files);
+
/*
* Must be called _before_ exec_mmap() as bprm->mm is
* not visible until then. Doing it here also ensures
@@ -1214,14 +1228,6 @@ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
clear_syscall_work_syscall_user_dispatch(me);
- /*
- * We have to apply CLOEXEC before we change whether the process is
- * dumpable (in setup_new_exec) to avoid a race with a process in userspace
- * trying to access the should-be-closed file descriptors of a process
- * undergoing exec(2).
- */
- do_close_on_exec(me->files);
-
if (bprm->secureexec) {
/* Make sure parent cannot signal privileged process. */
me->pdeath_signal = 0;
---
base-commit: 73ae59e975966d24e32926247ddb45a537ebe184
change-id: 20260907-cloexec-before-exec-update-lock-972ad108510c
Best regards,
--
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 21:26 Jann Horn [this message]
2026-09-08 10:20 ` Jan Kara
2026-09-08 16:45 ` Benjamin Peterson
2026-09-09 7:48 ` Christian Brauner
2026-09-11 11:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2026-09-11 15:11 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907-cloexec-before-exec-update-lock-v1-1-8018c201a7df@google.com \
--to=jannh@google.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benjamin@locrian.net \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jake@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®