From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@kernel.org
Cc: jack@suse.cz, andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cui.tao@linux.dev,
Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fs: reject U64_MAX as last_mnt_id in listmount()
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 14:57:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907065724.1355551-1-cui.tao@linux.dev> (raw)
From: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
listmount() uses mnt_id_req::param as a pagination cursor: on forward
iteration do_listmount() starts from the first mount with an id strictly
greater than last_mnt_id. The sanity check in prepare_klistmount() only
rejects ids in the range [1, MNT_UNIQUE_ID_OFFSET]; U64_MAX passes the
check, and incrementing it wraps back to 0, so mnt_find_id_at() restarts
from the leftmost mount in the namespace every time.
A caller paging with last_mnt_id set to U64_MAX therefore always gets
the same first batch of ids returned and can never advance to the end of
the list:
# base: every call returns the same first batch
listmount(param=U64_MAX) = 8 ids: 2147483886 2147483888 ...
# patched:
listmount(param=U64_MAX) = -1 EINVAL
Reject U64_MAX up front together with the other invalid ids.
Fixes: b4c2bea8ceaa ("add listmount(2) syscall")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
---
fs/namespace.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index 8d4009cfbf5b..cb95b855f78b 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -6108,6 +6108,9 @@ static inline int prepare_klistmount(struct klistmount *kls, struct mnt_id_req *
/* The first valid unique mount id is MNT_UNIQUE_ID_OFFSET + 1. */
if (last_mnt_id != 0 && last_mnt_id <= MNT_UNIQUE_ID_OFFSET)
return -EINVAL;
+ /* U64_MAX would wrap to 0 and restart the iteration. */
+ if (last_mnt_id == U64_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
kls->last_mnt_id = last_mnt_id;
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 6:57 Tao Cui [this message]
2026-09-07 9:45 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907065724.1355551-1-cui.tao@linux.dev \
--to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®